EP23.23: Diagnosis of adnexal lesions using ultrasound‐based artificial intelligence

R. Yoeli‐Bik,E. Lengyel,J.S. Abramowicz,H. Li,R.E. Longman,M. Giger,H.M. Whitney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28959

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 335-335, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

EP23.66: The application of artificial intelligence technology in the teaching of ultrasound diagnosis of adnexal masses

Q. Li,J. Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29001

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 344-344, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.19: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scoring systems in differentiating benign versus malignant adnexal masses

G. Khastgir,S. Siwatch,V. Jain,P. Sikka,T. Singh,R. Srinivasan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28955

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 333-334, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.37: Ultrasonography experience may not be a reliable indicator for improved accuracy in assessing malignancy in adnexal tumours using the ADNEX model

G. Ghanadan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28973

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 339-339, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

G. Ghanadan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28950

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 332-332, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.03: Adnexal masses in pregnancy

A. Dević

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28939

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 328-328, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP03.03: Role of artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound in gynecology oncology: a systematic review

F. Moro,M. Ciancia,D. Zace,M. Vagni,H. Tran,M. Giudice,S. Gambigliani Zoccoli,L. Boldrini,F. D'Antonio,G. Scambia,A. Testa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27894

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 65-66, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.17: Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

M.R. Louis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28953

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 333-333, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology

L. Drukker,J. A. Noble,A. T. Papageorghiou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000000910

2021-03-01

Abstract:(ed from Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:498–505)Artificial intelligence (AI) uses specific algorithms to come to conclusions and process human intelligence possibly better than humans can. Thus far, AI has had relatively little impact in the field of obstetrics and gynecology, although in the field providers rely on ultrasound images to make diagnoses.

obstetrics & gynecology
OP06.02: Deep learning radiomics based on contrast‐enhanced ultrasound images for accurate diagnosis of adnexal lesions: a retrospective multicentre study

M. Wu,H. Yang,Y. Wang,J. Hu,X. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27917

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 74-74, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.26: Diagnostic performance of antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease with artificial intelligence versus trained specialists

A. Sarmiento,N. Rodriguez,N. Rodríguez,P. Arbeláez,M.C. Escobar,A. Castillo,N. Ramirez,L.M. Echeverry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28041

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 114-114, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

J. Stirnemann,V. Debavelaere,G. Corda,N. Matevski,F. Loge,C. Amabile,C. Snell,M. Marquez,K.R. Faulk,V.C. Romero,M. Spiliopoulos,L. Ghulmiyyah,N. Fries,E. Spaggiari,Y. Ville

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28055

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 118-119, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP25.17: Ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis with histopathological correlation in women undergoing pre‐IVF ICSI treatment

M.R. Letifi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29064

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 358-358, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP03.02: Artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound diagnosis of pelvic gynecological tumours: a systematic scoping review and meta‐analysis

G. Garofalo,A. Geysels,S. Timmerman,L. Barreñada,B. De Moor,D. Timmerman,W. Froyman,B. Van Calster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27893

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 65-65, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging

Heather M Whitney,Roni Yoeli-Bik,Jacques S Abramowicz,Li Lan,Hui Li,Ryan E Longman,Ernst Lengyel,Maryellen L Giger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044505

Abstract:Purpose: Segmentation of ovarian/adnexal masses from surrounding tissue on ultrasound images is a challenging task. The separation of masses into different components may also be important for radiomic feature extraction. Our study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation method for transvaginal ultrasound images that (1) outlines the exterior boundary of adnexal masses and (2) separates internal components. Approach: A retrospective ultrasound imaging database of adnexal masses was reviewed for exclusion criteria at the patient, mass, and image levels, with one image per mass. The resulting 54 adnexal masses (36 benign/18 malignant) from 53 patients were separated by patient into training (26 benign/12 malignant) and independent test (10 benign/6 malignant) sets. U-net segmentation performance on test images compared to expert detailed outlines was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the ratio of the Hausdorff distance to the effective diameter of the outline ( R HD - D ) for each mass. Subsequently, in discovery mode, a two-level fuzzy c-means (FCM) unsupervised clustering approach was used to separate the pixels within masses belonging to hypoechoic or hyperechoic components. Results: The DSC (median [95% confidence interval]) was 0.91 [0.78, 0.96], and R HD - D was 0.04 [0.01, 0.12], indicating strong agreement with expert outlines. Clinical review of the internal separation of masses into echogenic components demonstrated a strong association with mass characteristics. Conclusion: A combined U-net and FCM algorithm for automatic segmentation of adnexal masses and their internal components achieved excellent results compared with expert outlines and review, supporting future radiomic feature-based classification of the masses by components.
EP24.29: Diagnosis of parametrial endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasonography

F. Buonomo,E. Dalla Bona,L. Ciampi,M. Giangreco,G. Ricci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29035

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 352-353, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.19: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of fetal ultrasound planes

J. Stirnemann,V. Debavelaere,G. Corda,N. Matevski,F. Loge,C. Amabile,L. Armstrong,K. Trychon,N. Logan,D. Bello,K. Sanchez,E. Spaggiari,Y. Ville

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28034

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 112-112, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.20: Artificial intelligence for estimating fetal intracranial volumes

C.P. Lulla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28035

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 112-113, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP06.03: Preoperative sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses using the new Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System

S. Einig,T. Puls,A. Schoetzau,H. Reina,C. Montavon,A. Butenschoen,V. Heinzelmann‐Schwarz,G. Manegold‐Brauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27918

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 74-74, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnoses of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sian Mitchell,Manolis Nikolopoulos,Alaa El-Zarka,Dhurgham Al-Karawi,Shakir Al-Zaidi,Avi Ghai,Jonathan E. Gaughran,Ahmad Sayasneh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020422

2024-01-20

Cancers

Abstract:Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common malignancy, with a 35% survival rate across all stages at 10 years. Ultrasound is widely used for ovarian tumour diagnosis, and accurate pre-operative diagnosis is essential for appropriate patient management. Artificial intelligence is an emerging field within gynaecology and has been shown to aid in the ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancers. For this study, Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched, and all original clinical studies that used artificial intelligence in ultrasound examinations for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancies were screened. Studies using histopathological findings as the standard were included. The diagnostic performance of each study was analysed, and all the diagnostic performances were pooled and assessed. The initial search identified 3726 papers, of which 63 were suitable for abstract screening. Fourteen studies that used artificial intelligence in ultrasound diagnoses of ovarian malignancies and had histopathological findings as a standard were included in the final analysis, each of which had different sample sizes and used different methods; these studies examined a combined total of 15,358 ultrasound images. The overall sensitivity was 81% (95% CI, 0.80–0.82), and specificity was 92% (95% CI, 0.92–0.93), indicating that artificial intelligence demonstrates good performance in ultrasound diagnoses of ovarian cancer. Further prospective work is required to further validate AI for its use in clinical practice.

oncology
EP22.03: Integrating ultrasound omics data and genomic information for early diagnosis of cervical cancer

S. Dong,L. Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28892

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 319-320, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

EP23.23: Diagnosis of adnexal lesions using ultrasound‐based artificial intelligence

EP23.66: The application of artificial intelligence technology in the teaching of ultrasound diagnosis of adnexal masses

EP23.19: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scoring systems in differentiating benign versus malignant adnexal masses

EP23.37: Ultrasonography experience may not be a reliable indicator for improved accuracy in assessing malignancy in adnexal tumours using the ADNEX model

EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

EP23.03: Adnexal masses in pregnancy

OP03.03: Role of artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound in gynecology oncology: a systematic review

EP23.17: Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology

OP06.02: Deep learning radiomics based on contrast‐enhanced ultrasound images for accurate diagnosis of adnexal lesions: a retrospective multicentre study

EP01.26: Diagnostic performance of antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease with artificial intelligence versus trained specialists

EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

EP25.17: Ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis with histopathological correlation in women undergoing pre‐IVF ICSI treatment

OP03.02: Artificial intelligence applied to ultrasound diagnosis of pelvic gynecological tumours: a systematic scoping review and meta‐analysis

AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging

EP24.29: Diagnosis of parametrial endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasonography

EP01.19: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of fetal ultrasound planes

EP01.20: Artificial intelligence for estimating fetal intracranial volumes

OP06.03: Preoperative sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses using the new Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System

Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnoses of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

EP22.03: Integrating ultrasound omics data and genomic information for early diagnosis of cervical cancer