Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To analyze the accuracy of ultrasound in assessing pelvic and intra-abdominal spread in patients with ovarian cancer.METHODS: This prospective study enrolled all consecutive patients referred to a single gynecological oncology center for suspected ovarian cancer. We analyzed only data from patients with histologically confirmed primary ovarian cancer who were evaluated following predefined preoperative ultrasound, intraoperative and pathology protocols. We evaluated the agreement of depth of infiltration of the rectosigmoid wall, tumor spread in different peritoneal compartments and presence of metastatic retroperitoneal and inguinal lymph nodes, as determined at ultrasound, with intraoperative and histopathological findings.RESULTS: In total, 578 patients were enrolled between March 2008 and January 2013, of whom 394 met the study inclusion criteria and were analyzed; 74% of these suffered from advanced-stage cancer. Our results showed excellent agreement between ultrasound and histology in assessment of rectosigmoid wall infiltration (kappa value, 0.812; area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve, 0.898). The overall accuracy in evaluating different peritoneal compartments, retroperitoneal and inguinal lymph nodes and depth of rectosigmoid wall infiltration was 85.3%, 84.8%, 99.7% and 91.1%, respectively. Ultrasound showed high sensitivity only in the assessment of rectosigmoid wall infiltration (83.1%), peritoneal spread into the pelvis (81.4%) and omentum (67.3%), and inguinal metastatic lymph nodes (100%). The specificity of ultrasound in detection of all evaluated parameters was > 90%.CONCLUSION: This is the largest imaging study to date on ovarian cancer staging. Ultrasound can be used as the method of choice to plan rectosigmoid wall resection and dissection of infiltrated inguinal lymph nodes. In assessing different peritoneal and retroperitoneal compartments, ultrasound was accurate and highly specific. However, similar to other modern imaging techniques, it had relatively low sensitivity, further supporting the role of comprehensive surgical staging. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

EP24.14: External validation study of preoperative ultrasound‐based AAGL staging system in prediction of AAGL surgical stage

EP24.25: Prospective validation of preoperative and surgical endometriosis staging systems using mobile device interface

Development And Validation Of A Surgical-Pathologic Staging And Scoring System For Cervical Cancer

EP24.30: Pilot study of intra‐ and interoperator agreement of a proposed image quality scoring system for transvaginal ultrasound images

EP24.03: Prediction of MBS item number and rASRM stage based on deep endometriosis ultrasound

EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

EP16.24: Preoperative identification and stratification of placenta percreta for team management: can we improve?

EP23.19: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scoring systems in differentiating benign versus malignant adnexal masses

EP19.19: Angle of progression for predicting second‐stage Caesarean delivery complications

EP26.02: Optimising care: how accurate diagnosis and imaging‐guided interventions can mitigate postoperative complications

OC04.03: Preoperative assessment of non‐resectability in ovarian cancer according to ESGO criteria: a prospective multicentre study using imaging (ISAAC study)

Ultrasound in preoperative assessment of pelvic and abdominal spread in patients with ovarian cancer: a prospective study

EP17.06: Inter‐manufacturer assessment of the diagnostic performance of angiogenic ratio versus glycosylated fibronectin in women with suspected pre‐eclampsia

EP23.37: Ultrasonography experience may not be a reliable indicator for improved accuracy in assessing malignancy in adnexal tumours using the ADNEX model

OP14.08: The role of three‐dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of urogenital prolapse: a prospective study of 20 patients

EP22.04: The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing adhesions around omental metastatic lesions of ovarian cancer

OP06.03: Preoperative sonographic evaluation of adnexal masses using the new Ovarian‐Adnexal Reporting and Data System

EP23.31: Assessment of the accuracy and safety of ultrasound guided tru‐cut biopsy in a tertiary hospital from 1 Jan 2021–31 Dec 2022: a retrospective study

EP23.35: External validation of the O‐RADS lexicon and the IOTA two‐step strategy to stratify tumours into O‐RADS risk groups in a North American academic centre

OC01.04: *AI‐driven ultrasound detection of ovarian cancer that generalises: an international multicentre validation study

EP01.64: What the clinicians think: the use of a growth parameter decision tool to help standardise care for women having ultrasounds