Abstract:Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the development of unstable ventricular tachycardia in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) and to analyze the potential of radionuclide methods in predicting life-threatening arrhythmias in the background of CRT. Materials and methods The study included 100 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy aged from 32 to 75 years (55±12 years). Patients had III functional class of heart failure (HF); left ventricular ejection fraction (LV) (EF) 30.1±3.8%; 6 minutes walk at a distance of 290.5±64.3 m; and the final diastolic volume of the left ventricle (EDV) is 220.7±50.9 ml. Before implantation of the device with CRT and after 1 year, all patients underwent a 24-hour ECG monitoring. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of paroxysms of unstable ventricular tachycardia. The 1st group included 55 patients (55%) with registered paroxysms of unstable ventricular tachycardia with adequate doses of antiarrhythmic drugs. Group 2 consisted of 45 patients (45%) without reported episodes. Prior to CRT, myocardial metabolism defect (MMD) was evaluated in all patients using radionuclide methods. Results Control tests were performed 1 year after the onset of CRT and showed positive clinical dynamics: the left ventricular EF increased from 30.1±3.8% to 42.8±4.8% (p≤0.001); functional class decreased from III to II; The 6-minute walking distance increased from 290.5±64.3 m to 377.2±45.3 m (p≤0.001); and LV EDV decreased from 220.7±50.9 ml to 197.9±47.8 ml (p≤0.005). During 1 year of observation in the first group: 48 patients (80%) had no episodes of unstable ventricular tachycardia; In 7 patients (20%), episodes of unstable ventricular tachycardia were recorded. Evaluation of the effect of increasing EF and reducing EDV on the development of VT paroxysms was performed after the distribution of patients with CRT into subgroups based on the presence or absence of VT episodes. The data showed that in patients whose EF increased by 14%, and EDV decreased by 35 ml during 1 year of CRT, there were no VT episodes, even if VT paroxysms were recorded before CRT. Patients who had VT paroxysms showed an increase in EF of only 9% and a decrease in EDV of only 13 ml. Phase 2 of the study was to assess the impact of MMD changes. In the presence of CRT in patients with less than 15% MMD, there were no VT episodes. VT paroxysms were reported in patients whose MMD exceeded 15%. Conclusions (1) Effective CRT in patents with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy significantly reduces the number of VT episodes. (2) Improving fatty acid metabolism (LVD MMD less than 15%) in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy reduces the incidence of VT episodes against the background of CRT.

Feasibility of a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Protocol for "off‐on" Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Evaluation

Clinical safety of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation compatible with magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients with Mild to Moderately Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Lessons from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation MIRACLE EF study

Device‐therapy in chronic heart failure: Cardiac contractility modulation versus cardiac resynchronization therapy

P4527Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe heart failure may influence the development of unstable ventricular tachycardia

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

CMR Feature Tracking-Based Left Atrial Mechanics Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adverse Outcomes.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and cardiac sympathetic function

Comparative Analysis of Response to Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Upgrades in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Pacemakers

Understanding Nonresponders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Current and Future Perspectives

Right ventricular systolic function and cardiac resynchronization therapy

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac contractility modulation with cardiac resynchronization therapy system

Discontinuation Of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy After Electric Reverse Remodeling A Case Report

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillator in Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical application of cardiac resynchronization therapy for refractory heart failure

P1493Cardiac contractility modulation in left ventricular systolic dysfunction: 1-year single Centre experience and clinical outcome

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in inotrope‐dependent heart failure: a meta‐analysis