Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Gender Diversity and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Pairing of Audit Partners

Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

The Negative Effect of Regional Banking Competition on Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Do auditors change their individual style? Examining the effects of client importance and competition on auditors' influence on earnings comparability in China

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

Audit partner style and financial statement comparability: New evidence from the US market

Tax Knowledge Diffusion Through Shared Audit Partners: Evidence From China

The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: evidence from a long panel

Stock Price Contagion Effects of Low-Quality Audits at the Individual Audit Partner Level

Audit Partner Assignments and Audit Quality in the United States

The Effect of Guanxi on Audit Quality in China

The informational role of audit partner industry specialization

Financial Distress, Investment Opportunity, and the Contagion Effect of Low Audit Quality: Evidence from China

The Price Contagion Effects of Financial Reporting Fraud and Reputational Losses: Evidence from the Individual Audit Partner Level

The effect of individual auditor quality on audit outcomes: opening the black box of audit quality

Do Regional Cultural Differences Affects the Effect of Accounting Firms’ Merger: Evidence from China