Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

The Effect of Guanxi on Audit Quality in China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Effect of Supervisor–subordinate Guanxi on Supervisory Decisions in China: an Empirical Investigation

Political connections, auditor choice and corporate accounting transparency: evidence from private sector firms in China

Individual Auditor Social Responsibility and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

The joint effects of social identity and institutional pressures on audit quality: The case of the Chinese Audit Industry

The Ethical Dimension of Management Ownership in China

Do Regulations Limiting Management Influence over Auditors Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China

Dual Effect of Government Control on Audit Quality

Do Social Ties Between Individual Auditors and Client CEOs/CFOs Matter to Audit Quality?

Does Sharing the Same Network Auditor in Group Affiliated Firms Affect Audit Quality?

Ultimate Ownership, Interlocking Directorship and Audit Independence

State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China

Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? Evidence from China

Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Insights into Guanxi and Firm Performance in China: an Integrated Lens of Culture and Guanxi