Improving the effectiveness of CPR during interventional procedures

Christopher Gaisendrees,Kaveh Eghbalzadeh,Matti Adam,Ilija Djordjevic,Oliver Mehler,Thorsten Wahlers,Elmar W Kuhn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241232279

2024-02-03

Perfusion

Abstract:Perfusion, Ahead of Print. IntroductionThe number of interventional procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements or thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, is on the rise. Intraprocedural cardiac arrest is a rare occurrence during high-risk procedures. Modern hybrid-operating tables may adversely affect chest compression quality due to their flexibility. To investigate this relationship, we analyzed the blood pressure generated during chest compressions at different degrees of table extension and assessed the effect of an additional stabilization bar to secure the table.MethodsA CPR manikin was connected to online blood pressure monitoring on a hybrid operating table. Chest compressions were administered using a mechanical device (at 100 bpm and 80 bpm). Hemodynamic effects were evaluated at various degrees of table extension (0%, 50%, 100% table extension) and with the addition of a stabilization bar.ResultsA greater degree of table extension was associated with lower diastolic blood pressure. The addition of a stabilization bar alleviated this drop in diastolic blood pressure and enabled the generation of higher mean arterial pressures at 50% and 100% table extension during chest compressions.ConclusionThe flexibility of a hybrid operating table adversely impacts the hemodynamic effect of chest compressions. This effect may be mitigated by using a stabilization bar. These results may be relevant for providing further recommendations for CPR guidelines in hybrid OR settings.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease