Abstract 17: Controlled Progressive Elevation Maximizes Cerebral Perfusion Pressure During Head up CPR in a Swine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Johanna C Moore,Bayert Salverda,Michael Lick,Carolina Rojas-Salvador,Guillaume Debaty,Nicolas Segal,Keith G Lurie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.17
IF: 37.8
2018-11-06
Circulation
Abstract:Background: Elevation of the head and thorax (HUP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to result in a doubling of brain blood flow with higher Cerebral Perfusion Pressures (CerPP) after prolonged active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR with an impedance threshold device (ITD). However, the optimal angle and speed of elevation are unknown. Methods: In study A, in an anesthetized female 40 kg pig model of untreated ventricular fibrillation for 8 min, different HUP angles were assessed (20°, 30°, 40°) in a randomized manner each over a 5-minute periods of ACD+ITD CPR. Based upon study A results, study B was performed, wherein animals were randomized to the two following sequences: 20°, 30°, 40° or 40°, 30°, 20° using the same protocol. The primary endpoint was mean ± SD CerPP (mmHg) for both studies. Results: In study A, 18 pigs were studied. Overall, there was no optimal HUP angle: CerPP was 36 ± 19 for 20°, 42 ± 21 for 30°, and 44 ± 27 for 40° (p = 0.57). However, CerPPs were higher if 40 o HUP was performed during the last 5 minutes of the resuscitation (77 ± 17), versus 20 o HUP and 30 o HUP (44± 18, p = 0.003), suggestive of a sequence effect. To test this hypothesis, study B then enrolled additional animals to compare two elevation sequences 20°, 30°, 40° (n = 6) or 40°, 30°, 20° (n = 5). At 15 min of CPR, the CerPP for 20°, 30°, 40° group was 60 ± 17 and for 40°, 30°, 20° the CerPP was 23 ± 19 (p = 0.01). CerPPs were higher for the 20°, 30°, 40° group throughout the resuscitation (Figure 1). Coronary perfusion pressure was also significantly higher in the 20°, 30°, 40° group (50 ± 17 mmHg versus 22 ± 16 mmHg, p = 0.036) Conclusions: There did not appear to be an optimal HUP angle during ACD+ITD CPR. By contrast, there was an optimal HUP sequence (20,30,40) that resulted in significantly higher CerPP, suggesting controlled progressive elevation is important when performing HUP CPR as compared to an absolute immediate elevation of the head and thorax.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?