Abstract:BACKGROUND:Current guidelines recommend a 50 mm or greater compression depth for manual chest compression in adults. However, whether this uniform compression depth is a suitable requirement for mechanical CPR remains to be determined. We hypothesized that a relatively shallow compression depth (30 mm) would have similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth (50 mm) during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the miniaturized chest compressor (MCC) in a porcine model.METHODS:In the current study, we used a total of 16 domestic male pigs (38±2 kg). All pigs were exposed to 7 min of ventricular fibrillation (VF) followed by 5 min of CPR. Then the animals were randomly assigned to the shallow (30 mm) group and the standard (50 mm) group. At the second min of CPR, every pig was given epinephrine (20 µg/kg) through the femoral vein and repeated every 3 min. First defibrillation was delivered with a single 120 J shock at 5 min of CPR. Hemodynamics, carotid blood flow (CBF), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), intrathoracic pressure (ITP) and arterial blood gas were measured. Rib fractures and lung injuries, as indicated by ground-glass opacification (GGO), as well as intense parenchymal opacification (IPO), were assessed and calculated by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan.RESULTS:We found no significant differences in CPP, CBF, or ETCO2 between the both groups throughout the CPR period. After administration of epinephrine, the CPP of all animals increased while ETCO2 and CBF decreased during CPR. A significantly lower intrathoracic positive pressure (ITPP) and systolic artery pressure (SAP) were measured in the shallow group at the first min of CPR. However, we didn't find remarkable differences in these values between the both groups for the next 4 min of CPR. All animals were successfully resuscitated. The shallow group had significantly lower IPO QCT scores compared with the standard group. We found no significant differences in GGO QCT scores after resuscitation between both groups.CONCLUSIONS:Relatively shallow compression depth has similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth.

Chest Decompressions - The Driver of CPR Efficacy: Exploring the Relationship Between Compression Rate, Depth, Recoil Velocity, and End-Tidal CO2

Chest Compression with Increases of Vascular Resistance of Limbs Augments Myocardial Perfusion

Effects Of Variable Depth Of Chest Compression On Outcomes Of Cpr

Rate at 120/min Provides Qualified Chest Compression During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Developing a kinematic understanding of chest compressions: the impact of depth and release time on blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract 140: Hemodynamic Efficacy and Gas Exchange During Continuous Chest Compressions or 30:2 Compression-to-Ventilation Ratio During Mechanical CPR in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Abstract 306: Similar Hemodynamic Efficacy Between 30 Mm and 50 Mm Compression Depth During Mechanical Chest Compression with Weil Mini Chest Compressor

Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Chest Compression Frequency and Depth for CPR

Near-optimal Waveforms for Improving Hemodynamic Effects during EDCPR

High-Quality Chest Compression for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Newly-Designed Automatic Device

Characterization of mechanical properties of adult chests during pre-hospital manual chest compressions through a simple viscoelastic model

Active Decompression during Automated Head-up Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The Optimization Study on Time Sequence of Enhanced External Counter-Pulsation in AEI-CPR

Compression Depth of 30 Mm Has Similar Efficacy and Fewer Complications Versus 50 Mm During Mechanical Chest Compression with Miniaturized Chest Compressor in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Effects of Chest Compression on Ventilation Quality During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The Comparison of the Effect of Two Mechanical Chest Compressors on Coronary Perfusion Pressure and Resuscitation Outcome During Cpr

Comparison of Effects of Real-Time Feedback devices on Chest Compression Quality of Basic Life Support-Certified and Non-Basic Life Support-Certified Rescuers: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

Computer Simulations of Hemodynamic Effects of Different CPR Techniques

Mechanical chest compression with a medical parallel manipulator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract 31: Comparison Between Mechanical Active Chest Compression/Decompression and Standard Mechanical Chest Compression

Transthoracic impedance for the monitoring of quality of manual chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.