3D radiated power analysis of JET SPI discharges using the Emis3D forward modeling tool

Benjamin Stein-Lubrano,Ryan Sweeney,Daniele Bonfiglio,Jack Lovell,Pedro Carvalho,Larry R Baylor,Robert Granetz,Stefan Jachmich,Emmanuel Henri Joffrin,Mengdi Kong,Michael Lehnen,Costanza F Maggi,Earl S Marmar,Eric Nardon,Paulo Puglia,Umar Ahmed Sheikh,Daisuke Shiraki,Scott Alan Silburn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad1d10

IF: 3.3

2024-01-12

Nuclear Fusion

Abstract:Precise values for radiated energy in tokamak disruption experiments are needed to validate disruption mitigation techniques for burning plasma tokamaks like ITER and SPARC. Control room analysis of radiated power (P rad ) on JET assumes axisymmetry, since fitting 3D radiation structures with limited bolometry coverage is an underdetermined problem. In mitigated disruptions, radiation is toroidally asymmetric and 3D, due to fast-growing 3D MHD modes and localized impurity sources. To address this problem, Emis3D adopts a physics motivated forward modeling ("guess and check") approach, comparing experimental bolometry data to synthetic data from user-defined radiation structures. Synthetic structures are observed with the Cherab modeling framework and a best fit chosen using a reduced χ 2 statistic. 2D tomographic inversion models are tested, as well as helical flux tubes and 3D MHD simulated structures from JOREK. Two nominally identical pure neon shattered pellet injection (SPI) mitigated discharges in JET are analyzed. 2D tomographic inversions with added toroidal freedom are the best fits in the thermal quench (TQ) and current quench (CQ). In the pre-TQ, 2D reconstructions are statistically the best fits, but are likely over-optimized and do not capture the 3D radiation structure seen in fast camera images. The next-best pre-TQ fits are helical structures that extend towards the high-field side, consistent with an impurity flow under the magnetic nozzle effect also observed in JOREK simulations. Whole-disruption radiated fractions of 0.98 +0.03/-0.29 and 1.01 +0.02/-0.17 are found, suggesting that the stored energy may have been fully mitigated by each SPI, although mitigation efficiencies well below ITER and SPARC requirements for high energy pulses are still within the large uncertainties. Emis3D is also used to validate JOREK SPI simulations, and confirms improvements in matching experiment from changes to impurity modeling. Time-dependent toroidal peaking factors are calculated and discussed.

physics, fluids & plasmas

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to measure the radiative energy more accurately in disruption events in tokamak devices (such as JET). Specifically, the paper focuses on how to accurately analyze the three - dimensional (3D) radiative power when using Shattered Pellet Injection (SPI) for disruption mitigation experiments. The traditional control - room analysis method assumes axisymmetry, which is not always valid in actual disruption events because the radiative structure becomes 3D and toroidally asymmetric during the disruption process. This asymmetry is caused by rapidly growing 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes and local impurity sources.

To meet this challenge, the paper introduces the Emis3D forward - modeling tool, which adopts a physics - driven forward - modeling approach to select the best - fitting radiative structure by comparing experimental bolometry data with synthetic data of user - defined radiative structures. Emis3D overcomes the highly under - determined problem faced by standard tomography techniques by reducing the χ² statistic to select the best - fitting radiative structure.

The main objectives of the paper are:
1. **Improve the accuracy of radiative power measurement**: Improve the accuracy of radiative power measurement by considering 3D radiative structures, especially in the case of toroidal asymmetry.
2. **Verify disruption mitigation techniques**: Verify the effectiveness of disruption mitigation techniques for burning plasma tokamaks (such as ITER and SPARC), especially by evaluating the performance of these techniques through a high radiative energy fraction (frad).
3. **Analyze specific experimental data**: Through a detailed analysis of two nominally identical pure neon Shattered Pellet Injection (SPI) - mitigated discharges, explore the differences in radiative behavior between different discharges and propose possible reasons.

Through these objectives, the paper aims to provide more reliable radiative measurement methods for future tokamak experiments, thereby better understanding and optimizing disruption mitigation techniques.