Abstract:PURPOSE To assess image quality and diagnostic performance of unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with use of flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared steady-state free precession (SSFP) of the foot arteries in patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was approved by institutional review board. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Thirty-two healthy volunteers and 38 diabetic patients who had been scheduled for lower-extremity contrast material-enhanced MR angiography were recruited to undergo unenhanced MR angiography with a 1.5-T MR unit. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced MR angiography in the detection of significant arterial stenosis (≥50%) were assessed by two independent reviewers. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was used as the reference standard. The difference in the percentage of diagnostic arterial segments at unenhanced MR angiography between healthy volunteers and diabetic patients was evaluated with the McNemar test and generalized estimating equation for correlated data. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and artery-to-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pedal arteries were measured and compared between the two MR angiography techniques by using the paired t test. RESULTS All subjects successfully underwent unenhanced MR angiography of the foot. Unenhanced MR angiography yielded a high percentage of diagnostic arterial segments in both healthy volunteers (303 of 320 segments, 95%) and patients (341 of 370 segments, 92%), and there was no difference in the percentage between the two populations (P = .195). In patients, the average SNR and CNR at unenhanced MR angiography were higher than those at contrast-enhanced MR angiography (SNR: 90.7 ± 38.1 vs 81.7 ± 34.7, respectively, P = .023; CNR: 85.2 ± 33.2 vs 76.6 ± 33.5, respectively, P = .013). The average sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of unenhanced MR angiography were 88% (35 of 40 segments), 93% (107 of 115 segments), 81% (35 of 43 segments), 96% (107 of 112 segments), and 92% (142 of 155 segments), respectively. Interobserver agreement between the two readers for diagnostic accuracy was good (κ = 0.83). CONCLUSION Unenhanced MR angiography with use of FSD-prepared SSFP allows clear depiction of the foot arterial tree and accurate detection of significant arterial stenosis. The technique has the potential to be a safe and reliable screening tool for the assessment of foot arteries in diabetic patients without the use of gadolinium-based contrast material.

The effect of non-contrast enhanced MRA on patients with renal insufficiency and foot pain

Evaluation of Infrapopliteal Occlusive Disease with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Diabetic Patients

Evaluation of Non-contrast-enhanced In-flow Inversion Recovery MR Angiographyon Renal Artery Stenosis

Unenhanced Respiratory-Gated Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of Renal Artery in Hypertensive Patients Using True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Technique Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRA.

Magnetic Resonance Multitasking for Multidimensional Assessment of Cardiovascular System: Development and Feasibility Study on the Thoracic Aorta

Assessment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis with Non-contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Detection of Infragenual Arterial Disease Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Mr Angiography in Patients with Diabetes

Three-dimensional Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography in Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis:Comparison with DSA

Non-contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: a Reliable Clinical Tool for Evaluating Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis

Non-Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography (NCE-MRA) of the Calf: A Direct Comparison between Flow-Sensitive Dephasing (FSD) Prepared Steady-State Free Precession (SSFP) and Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot (QISS) in Patients with Diabetes

High-Resolution 3d Contrast-Enhanced Mra with Parallel Imaging Techniques Before Endovascular Interventional Treatment of Arterial Stenosis

Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis with 3D Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography

High-Resolution 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Reanl Arteries with Fluoroscopic Triggering and Parallel Acquisition Techniques:Preliminary Experience

3-D contrast-enhanced MRA before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis

Non-contrast MRI examination on aortic diseases

Unenhanced MR Angiography of the Foot: Initial Experience of Using Flow-Sensitive Dephasing-Prepared Steady-State Free Precession in Patients with Diabetes.

A preliminary study of renal function for renal artery stenosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Turbo spin-echo-based enhanced acceleration-selective arterial spin labeling without electrocardiography or peripheral pulse unit triggering and contrast enhancement for lower extremity MRA

Preliminary Experience of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with High Mechanical Index in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis

Scan parameter optimization of renal artery with inflow-sensitive inversion recovery magnetic resonance angiography

Hemodynamic Analysis of Renal Artery Stenosis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Technology Based on Unenhanced Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Preliminary Results.