Evaluation of Non-contrast-enhanced In-flow Inversion Recovery MR Angiographyon Renal Artery Stenosis

Wei Wu
2013-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of non-contrast-enhanced in-flow inversion recovery (IFIR) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for detection of renal artery stenosis , with breath-hold contrast–enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Sixty-two patients suspected of renal artery stenosis underwent both IFIR-MRA and CE-MRA. The imaging quality and the stenosis of both techniques were assessed and compared. Results 148 renal arteries (including accessory renal arteries) were displayed by both IFIR-MRA and CE-MRA. The imaging quality of IFIR-MRA was excellent 113 (76.4%), good 20 (13.5%) and poor 15 (10.1%), while the CE-MRA were excellent 123 (83.1%), good 11 (7.4%) and poor 14 (9.5%). The stenosis on 141 vessels could be measured. In a 0-3 stenosis grading system, the IFIR- MRA were 104, 18, 14, 5 and CE-MRA were 103, 22, 9, 7, respectively, showing good correlation (r=0.843, P0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of IFIR for renal stenosis detection were 81.2%, 95.2%, 93.6%, 68.4% and 97.5%, respectively with CE-MRA as reference. Conclusion The non-contrast-enhanced IFIR MRA is well consistent with the CE-MRA in renal stenosis detection and can be an alternative to CE-MRA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?