Abstract:Objectives To explore the role of Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal artery stenosis and analyze the causes of the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Methods The data of 40 patients (80 renal arteries) diagnosed with RAS by CEUS in Beijing Hospital from September 2018 to October 2020 were compared with their digital subtraction angiography (DSA) results to analyze the causes underlying missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of RAS by CEUS. Results 1. Compared with the gold standard DSA results, the AUC of the ROC curve of CEUS in detecting normal renal artery and renal artery stenosis was 0.961, the sensitivity was 96.4%, the specificity was 95.8%, and the Kappa value of the consistency analysis was 0.912 ( P < 0.01); 2. Compared with the gold standard DSA results, the ROC curve of CEUS in distinguishing renal artery stenosis ≥70% from <70% stenosis has an AUC of 0.916, a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 92.3%, and the Kappa value of the consistency analysis is 0.77 ( P < 0.01); 3. CEUS missed two cases (one for mild stenosis and one for moderate stenosis), and the detection rate of renal artery stenosis was 97.5% (78/80); A total of 65 renal arteries diagnosed by CEUS were consistent with DSA, and the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the degree of stenosis was 81.25% (65/80); Among the 13 misdiagnosed renal arteries, 4 of them can be corrected to the same degree as DSA by the reference to hemodynamic index, and the diagnosis rate of the degree of renal artery stenosis by ultrasonography (combined with CEUS and hemodynamic indicators) can be improved to 86.25%. Conclusions 1. CEUS can clearly show the renal arteries, and is consistent with DSA in distinguishing normal renal artery stenosis from renal artery stenosis, as well as renal artery stenosis ≥70% and <70% stenosis; 2. CEUS showed good performance in detecting normal renal artery and renal artery stenosis, and the missed diagnosis is concentrated on mild and moderate stenosis; 3. CEUS combined with hemodynamic indicators (Doppler ultrasound) can improve the accurate diagnosis rate of renal artery stenosis by ultrasonography; 4. The most important factor for the accurate diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by CEUS is the operator's standardized examination, which is not only related to the duration of the operator has been engaged in this inspection, but also related to whether the operator has received professional training in relevant aspects. These all indicate the necessity and importance of the standardized operation of renal artery contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination, and professional training should be given to operators.

Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model

Renal Artery Assessment with Non-Enhanced MR Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison Between 1.5 and 3.0 T

Evaluation of Non-contrast-enhanced In-flow Inversion Recovery MR Angiographyon Renal Artery Stenosis

Evaluation of Infrapopliteal Occlusive Disease with Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Diabetic Patients

High-Resolution 3d Contrast-Enhanced Mra with Parallel Imaging Techniques Before Endovascular Interventional Treatment of Arterial Stenosis

The capability of inflow inversion recovery magnetic resonance compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance in renal artery angiography

3-D contrast-enhanced MRA before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis

Assessment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis with Non-contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Unenhanced Respiratory-Gated Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of Renal Artery in Hypertensive Patients Using True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Technique Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRA.

Three-dimensional Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography in Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis:Comparison with DSA

Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis with 3D Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography

Non-contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: a Reliable Clinical Tool for Evaluating Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis

The Use of Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction With Radial Acquisition MRA to Assess Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Pre- and Post-stent Angioplasty: Comparison With 3D Time-of-Flight MRA and DSA

Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis

Hemodynamic Analysis of Renal Artery Stenosis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Technology Based on Unenhanced Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Preliminary Results.

A preliminary study of renal function for renal artery stenosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Ultrashort echo time time‐spatial labeling inversion pulse magnetic resonance angiography with denoising deep learning reconstruction for the assessment of abdominal visceral arteries

Preliminary Experience of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with High Mechanical Index in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis

Comparison of pulmonary artery dimensions in swine obtained from catheter angiography, multi-slice computed tomography, 3D-rotational angiography and phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography

Peripheral contrast-enhanced MRA at open-bore 3 T, with low dose contrast agent

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Renal Arterial Stenosis