Three-dimensional Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography in Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis:Comparison with DSA

XU Yu-feng,WANG Xiao-ying,ZOU Qiang,SUN Xiao-wei,ZOU Ying-hua,JIANG Xue-xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2005.12.035
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the value of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Methods Twenty-eight consecutive patients suspected of renal artery stenosis underwent both DSA and CEMRA. Two radiologists evaluated the main renal arteries on CEMRA and DSA images in consensus. The renal arteries were recorded as five grades: Grade 1: normal; Grade 2: stenosis50%; Grade 3: stenosis 50%-75%; Grade 4: stenosis75%; Grade 5: occlusion. The data were analyzed by SPSS 11.5 software. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of CEMRA were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for depiction of hemodynamically significant stenosis (50%). Cohen Kappa analysis was used to assess agreement between the two imaging modalities in grading of stenosis and depiction of significant stenosis. Accessory renal arteries were also evaluated. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CEMRA for depiction of renal artery stenosis was 95.0%, 94.4%, 90.4%, and 97.1%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.955. Kappa was 0.924 for detection of significant stenosis and 0.899 for grading of stenosis. The detection rate of accessory renal artery was 87.5% (7/8). Conclusion CEMRA should be the first choice method in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. It can accurately diagnose significant stenosis (50%), and have consistency with DSA in grading renal stenosis. Performing CEMRA in patients suspected of renal artery stenosis can help to avoid unnecessary DSA procedure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?