Fe Kα XANES, Fe Kβ HERFD XANES and EPMA flank method determinations of the oxidation state of Fe in garnet

Megan Holycross,Elizabeth Cottrell,Jay Ague,Antonio Lanzirotti,Matthew Newville
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.121937
IF: 3.9
2024-01-16
Chemical Geology
Abstract:The ferric to total iron ratios (Fe 3+ /∑Fe) of garnets can be paired with thermodynamic mineral activity models to quantify the oxygen fugacity of garnet-bearing rocks. However, techniques with a high analytical and spatial resolution are necessary to distinguish differences in garnet Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios at the percent level and to accurately measure garnets that are zoned or contain inclusions. We acquired conventional Fe Kα and high-resolution energy fluorescence detection (HERFD) Fe Kβ X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra and electron microprobe flank method analyses on a suite of 27 peridotitic and eclogitic garnets with Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios previously determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy to evaluate the precision of each technique. We examined variations in the energy and intensity of three XANES spectral features as a function of Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios: 1) the intensity ratio of two-post edge features (I-ratio; Fe Kα only); 2) the energy of the Fe edge at 90% normalized intensity (E 0.9 ; Fe Kα only) and 3) the pre-edge centroid energy (Fe Kα and HERFD Fe Kβ). In accordance with previous work, we find the energies of garnet pre-edge centroids are relatively insensitive to Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios. The I-ratios of peridotitic and eclogitic garnets are offset from each other at low Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios (≤0.13); I-ratio garnet XANES calibrations are composition-specific. The E 0.9 feature is independent of garnet major element composition in spectra that have been corrected for the effects of self-absorption. We produce two Fe Kα garnet XANES calibrations based on variations in the E 0.9 feature; one calibration with all garnet reference materials included (Fe 3+ /∑Fe up to 1.0; "all garnet calibration") and another calibration specific to garnets with low Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios ("low ferric calibration"). Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios calculated from the mean of up to 25 flank method measurements on eight garnet reference materials fall within 4% absolute of a one-to-one correlation with Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratios measured by Mössbauer. The standard error of the mean Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratio calculated from flank method approaches the Mössbauer-determined Fe 3+ /∑Fe ratio within estimated error (3%) after three analyses. Flank method precision is enhanced at higher beam current; however, the precision of the flank method does not approach the precision of XANES under any microprobe analytical condition tested here. Garnet reference materials detailed here are available by request to the Smithsonian Institution.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?