Garnet geochronology, major and trace element geochemistry of the Huanggangliang Fe-Sn polymetallic deposit, NE China
Yongshun Li,Zhongfa Liu,Yongjun Shao,Lei Liu,Ke Chen,Hongtao Zhao,Shixiang You,Mingpeng He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106048
IF: 3.3
2024-04-23
Ore Geology Reviews
Abstract:Cu-Fe (Au), W-Sn (Mo), Pb-Zn (Ag) and other element assemblages are common in many skarn deposits, but examples of Fe and Sn coexistence in nature are relatively rare. The Huanggangliang deposit in the southern Great Xing'an Range is the largest Fe-Sn polymetallic deposit in northern China, and there are five main mining areas (SK I–SK V) distributed along a SW–NE trend. SK I and SK III are the two larger mining areas in the Huanggangliang deposit, and their mineral assemblages and wall-rocks are significantly different: cassiterite and metal sulfides are duncommon in SK I (andesite), while they are widely distributed in SK III (marble). Garnet is widely distributed in SK I and SK III mining areas, and provides a good opportunity to explore the mechanism of Fe-Sn assemblage differentiation. Three types of garnet are distinguishable (Grt 1, Grt 2 and Grt 3) based on their mineral associations, textures and locations, and they mainly belong to the andradite-grossular solid solution series. The LA–ICP–MS U-Pb ages of the garnets from SK I and SK III are 136.0 ± 1.2 Ma (n = 25, MSWD = 1.9) and 136.2 ± 2.6 Ma (n = 37, MSWD = 1.8), respectively, suggesting that magmatic-hydrothermal activity in these two mining areas began at the same time. Grt 1 (located deep in SK I and SK III) and Grt 2 (located shallowly in SK I) are mainly andradite, while Grt 3 (located shallowly in SK III) is mainly grossular. They are all enriched in high field strength elements (HFSEs) and depleted in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs), and their REE patterns are enriched in light rare earth elements (LREEs) and depleted in heavy rare earth elements (HREEs). However, Grt I-1a and 1b (deep garnets in SK I) exhibit obvious positive Eu anomalies, while the other garnet types exhibit negative or no obvious Eu anomalies. Additionally, Grt 3 has high contents of V, Sn, U, Th, Zn and Y, and low contents of W and Mo. This pattern implies that the garnets in deep SK I may have formed under oxidizing conditions with high temperatures, high oxygen fugacity ( f O 2 ) and weak acidity, while the garnets in shallow SK III formed under reducing conditions with moderate temperatures, moderate f O 2 and near-neutral pH. The garnets in shallow SK I and deep SK III may have formed under weak oxidation–reduction conditions at moderate to high temperatures, moderate f O 2 and weakly acidic to neutral pH conditions. Our newly reported field geological, mineralogical, and geochemical data from garnet suggest that the ore-forming fluids of the Huanggangliang were magmatic-hydrothermal fluids mixed with slightly acidic external fluids, chloride complexes may have been the main transport ligands of REEs. The metallogenic environment may be an important factor leading to the difference of mineral assemblages in the Huanggangliang deposit.
mineralogy,geology,mining & mineral processing