Abstract:Our autobiographical experiences typically occur within the context of familiar spatial locations. When we encode these experiences into memory, we can use our spatial map of the world to help organize these memories and later retrieve their episodic details. However, it is still not well understood what psychological and neural factors make spatial contexts an effective scaffold for storing and accessing memories. We hypothesized that spatial locations with distinctive and stable neural representations would best support the encoding and robust reinstatement of new episodic memories. We developed a novel paradigm that allowed us to quantify the within-participant reliability of a spatial context (“room reliability”) memory encoding, which could then be used to predict the degree of successful re-activation of item memories. To do this, we constructed a virtual reality (VR) “memory palace”, a custom-built environment made up of 23 distinct rooms that participants explored using a head-mounted VR display. The day after learning the layout of the environment, participants underwent whole-brain fMRI while being presented with videos of the rooms in the memory palace, allowing us to measure the reliability of the neural activity pattern associated with each room. Participants were taken back to VR and asked to memorize the locations of 23 distinct objects randomly placed within each of the 23 rooms, and then returned to the scanner as they recalled the objects and the rooms in which they appeared. We found that our room reliability measure was predictive of object reinstatement across cortex, and further showed that this was driven not only by the group-level reliability of a room across participants, but also the idiosyncratic reliability of rooms within each participant. Together, these results showcase how the quality of the neural representation of a spatial context can be quantified and used to ‘audit’ its utility as a memory scaffold for future experiences.

Context reinstatement requires a schema relevant virtual environment to benefit object recall

Enhancing learning and retention with distinctive virtual reality environments and mental context reinstatement

The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory

Context Binding in Visual Working Memory is Reflected in Bilateral Event-Related Potentials, but Not in Contralateral Delay Activity

Overlapping and Distinct Contributions of Stimulus Location and of Spatial Context to Nonspatial Visual Short-Term Memory

Context and semantic object properties interact to support recognition memory

Context in memory is reconstructed not encoded

Electrophysiological evidence for context reinstatement effects on object recognition memory

Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations

Context-Dependent Memory in Situated Visualization

How sturdy is your memory palace? Reliable room representations predict subsequent reinstatement of placed objects

Does context matter for memory? Testing the effectiveness of learning by imagining situated interactions with objects

Reactivation of Schema Representation in Lateral Occipital Cortex Supports Successful Memory Encoding.

Integrated Encoding of Relations and Objects in Visual Working Memory.

Reduction of Forgetting by Contextual Variation During Encoding Using 360-Degree Video-Based Immersive Virtual Environments

Effects of Schema on the Relationship Between Post-Encoding Brain Connectivity and Subsequent Durable Memory

Real and virtual environments have comparable spatial memory distortions after scale and geometric transformations

Partially overlapping spatial environments trigger reinstatement in hippocampus and schema representations in prefrontal cortex

Reconciling categorization and memory via environmental statistics

The relationship between environmentally induced emotion and memory for a naturalistic virtual experience

Testing memory of a VR environment: comparison with the real environment and 2D pictures