Abstract:Our autobiographical experiences typically occur within the context of familiar spatial locations. When we encode these experiences into memory, we can use our spatial map of the world to help organize these memories and later retrieve their episodic details. However, it is still not well understood what psychological and neural factors make spatial contexts an effective scaffold for storing and accessing memories. We hypothesized that spatial locations with distinctive and stable neural representations would best support the encoding and robust reinstatement of new episodic memories. We developed a novel paradigm that allowed us to quantify the within-participant reliability of a spatial context (“room reliability”) memory encoding, which could then be used to predict the degree of successful re-activation of item memories. To do this, we constructed a virtual reality (VR) “memory palace”, a custom-built environment made up of 23 distinct rooms that participants explored using a head-mounted VR display. The day after learning the layout of the environment, participants underwent whole-brain fMRI while being presented with videos of the rooms in the memory palace, allowing us to measure the reliability of the neural activity pattern associated with each room. Participants were taken back to VR and asked to memorize the locations of 23 distinct objects randomly placed within each of the 23 rooms, and then returned to the scanner as they recalled the objects and the rooms in which they appeared. We found that our room reliability measure was predictive of object reinstatement across cortex, and further showed that this was driven not only by the group-level reliability of a room across participants, but also the idiosyncratic reliability of rooms within each participant. Together, these results showcase how the quality of the neural representation of a spatial context can be quantified and used to ‘audit’ its utility as a memory scaffold for future experiences.

Does context matter for memory? Testing the effectiveness of learning by imagining situated interactions with objects

The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory

Overlapping and Distinct Contributions of Stimulus Location and of Spatial Context to Nonspatial Visual Short-Term Memory

Isolating the effects of visual imagery on prospective memory

How to change your memory of an object with a posture and a verb

Imagining abstractness: The role of embodied simulations and language in memory for abstract concepts

Context reinstatement requires a schema relevant virtual environment to benefit object recall

Seeing What I Did (Not): Cerebral and Behavioral Effects of Agency and Perspective on Episodic Memory Re-activation

Interference from Mere Thinking: Mental Rehearsal Temporarily Disrupts Recall of Motor Memory.

Imagining is not seeing: lower insight-driven memory reconfiguration when imagining the link between separate events

Influence of mental imagery on spatial presence and enjoyment assessed in different types of media

Using imagination and the contents of memory to create new scene and object representations: A functional MRI study

Which modality is best for delivering an imagery script? Evidence for desirable difficulty effect

Shared memories driven by the intrinsic memorability of items

Context-Dependent Memory in Situated Visualization

Context and semantic object properties interact to support recognition memory

Is the construction of spatial models multimodal? New evidences towards sensory-motor information involvement from temporary blindness study

The beneficial effects of concept definition and interactive imagery tasks on associative memory: Evidence from event-related potentials

How sturdy is your memory palace? Reliable room representations predict subsequent reinstatement of placed objects

“Embodied” language processing: Mental motor imagery aptitude predicts word-definition skill for high but not for low imageable words in adolescents

Vividness of Visual Imagery and Incidental Recall of Verbal Cues, When Phenomenological Availability Reflects Long-Term Memory Accessibility