Abstract:In terms of methodology, ethical literary criticism is an approach to literary criticism developed on the basis of the introduction of ethical methods and the assimilation of them into the texture of literary critical methods. It is used not only to interpret the moral phenomena recorded in literature on a historical and dialectic basis, but also to make value Judgment of those in the present literature based on the moral values in the reality. In nature European literature since Homer's epics is ethical and thus the earliest Greek literary criticism took the standpoint of moral criticism, of which the judgment of good and evil serves as the essential criterion. Plato tended to criticize literary works based on the moral values in the reality and to judge the quality of literary works according to the moral codes of his times, and thus he took an approach of moral criticism. Aristotle, however, took a different view of literary criticism that is closer to what we advanced as "ethical literary criticism" and Poetics is the great practice of literary criticism. But the ethical literary criticism is somewhat different from that of Greek literary theorists as it could take a new approach to Homer's epics and Greek tragedies. Generally speaking, ethical literary criticism is similar to moral criticism in the object of study, but is quite different from the latter in terms of research methods, objectives and the goals they may achieve respectively. This paper is to illustrate such differences through an analysis of Shakespeare's Hamlet, in which the cause of Hamlet's tragedy does not owe to his character and complex, but to his ethical dilemma, from the perspective of ethical literary criticism. On the other hand, ethical literary criticism, with basically a historical point of view, is still open to some contemporary theories and methods such as bio-criticism so as to form a comparative viewpoint in the study of literature.

Fairness, Hierarchy, and Moral Rationalization, or What's Wrong With Paradise Lost?

Belief in Literature: Opposing Moral Hypocrisy and Moral Nihilism

On Ethical Literary Criticism And Moral Criticism

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Ethical literary criticism: ethical choice and Sphinx factor

The Gap Between Fairness and Law

Towards an Ethical Literary Criticism

Reflecting on Paradise Lost via Reinforcement Learning and Resistance AI Literature

Moral dumbfounding and imaginative resistance

When Good, Bad, and Evil Don’t Matter: An Analysis of the Characterization of Satan in Paradise Lost

The Role of Morality in Emotional Reactions to and Enjoyment of Media Entertainment

Rationality and Free Will in Paradise Lost from Satan and Human Degradation

Constructing Miltonic Interiority: Adam, Satan, and Conscience in Paradise Lost

Law, Reason, and Emotion

Paradiastole, Lost and Regained

Empathy & Literature

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

When Feeling Good Feels “Wrong”: Avoiding Hedonic Consumption When It Reflects Immoral Character

Principles of Moral Accounting: How our Intuitive Moral Sense Balances Rights and Wrongs

How Do Basic Personality Traits Map Onto Moral Judgments of Fairness-Related Actions?

Respect for the Moral Law: the Emotional Side of Reason