Ethical literary criticism: ethical choice and Sphinx factor

Zhenzhao Nie
2011-01-01
Abstract:After the first biological selection of humankind, it is regarded as the second important choice, the ethical one, that Adam and Eve picked and ate the forbidden fruit in Eden and Oedipus solved the riddle of the Sphinx. It is the ethical choice to distinguish humankind from animals and made savagery people to be ethical beings. In ethical sense, Man is Sphinx(an existence of Sphinx factor), a combination of rational factor and animal factor. Sphinx factor is the core content of ethical statement in literary works. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, Gray makes an ethical choice which is to exchange the identity with his picture that results in his tragedy in the end. halo Calvino in The Cloven Viscount describes the conflict of rational will and irrational will in the divided viscount, as represented in the kind viscount and the evil one. In classic Chinese novel Journey to the West, Monkey King (Sun Wukong) is the embodiment of natural will Hsuan Tsang (Tang-monk; Tangseng) his master imposes restraints upon him by means of a hat and a spell to it, and ultimately helps him convert from a monkey to a human being (a Buddhist). These highly metaphorical literary texts not only provide us examples of different combinations of Sphinx factor and its variations, reveal clearly the value of this ethical choice in the history of social and individuals, but also manifest the ethical conflicts among rational will, natural will and irrational will. In reflecting on these ethical issues we feel greatly enlightened.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?