Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) in Non-clinical and Clinical populations

Panwen Zhang,Na Zhang,Shulin Fang,Jiayue He,Lejia Fan,Xingwei Luo,Jianghua Zhang,Yan Xiong,Fusheng Luo,Xiaosheng Wang,Shuqiao Yao,Xiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.068
IF: 6.533
2021-02-01
Journal of Affective Disorders
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Anhedonia, a key symptom of depression and schizophrenia, has emerged as a potential endophenotype. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale(SHAPS), a self-report anhedonia scale, in a non-clinical sample and clinical sample inclusive of major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia, or a personality disorder.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A total of 4,722 undergraduate students and 352 clinical patients participated in this study. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α and mean inter-item correlation (MIC) values. Test-retest reliability and convergent validity was assessed with Pearson r coefficients. The best fitting of six potential factor-structure models was determined by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Measurement invariance across genders and samples was determined by multi-group CFA.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Internal consistency of the Chinese version of SHAPS was acceptable in non-clinical (Cronbach's α = 0.90) and clinical (Cronbach's α = 0.91) samples. Four-week interval test-retest reliability was 0.60. Moreover, the Spanish four-factor structure had the best fit indexes in both samples. Scalar invariance was established across genders as well as across non-clinical sample and clinical sample. SHAPS was significantly related with the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Limitations</h3><p>There was a restricted scope of convergent validity and the size of clinical sample is relatively small, psychometric properties in elderly sample is also required.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The Chinese version of SHAPS is a reliable, effective, simple and convenient tool for assessing and screening for anhedonia.</p>
psychiatry,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?