Abstract:In the context of environmental deterioration and people's growing environmental protection awareness, governments or regions have put forward corresponding carbon emission reduction policies. Among them, the carbon trading mechanism, as an effective means to promote enterprises to implement emission reduction measures, plays a crucial role in regulating enterprise behavior and promoting social sustainable development. Since various industries and sectors support each other in social and economic development, it is more reasonable to study the carbon emission reduction optimization decisions of society and enterprises from the perspective of the supply chain. To achieve the carbon reduction target of the supply chain system, manufacturing enterprises usually need to incur additional costs to invest in emission reduction technologies, and retail enterprises also need to conduct low-carbon publicity to increase product market share. On one hand, considering the impact of the government's emission reduction constraints and consumers' low-carbon preferences, manufacturers will take corporate social responsibility (CSR) into consideration to enhance product competitiveness. On the other hand, smaller retailers are more concerned about being treated fairly than about their own profits due to the extra cost of low-carbon advertising. In this paper, considering the background of carbon trading, the manufacturer's CSR and retailer's fairness concern behavior are introduced into the decision-making process of the low-carbon supply chain (LCSC), and the relevant emission reduction decision-making model is constructed by using Stackelberg game theory and backward derivation method. Through comparative analysis of relevant parameters, members' profits and utilities, this paper focuses on the influence of CSR and fairness concerns on system decision-making. The results show that the optimal way for LCSC decision-making is to cooperate with fair-concerned retailers and manufacturers with CSR. When manufacturers consider social responsibility within a certain range and retailers bear part of the cost of social responsibility as followers, it can not only effectively improve the emission reduction level of the supply chain and the profits of each entity, but also help to increase the enthusiasm of each entity for carbon emission reduction and the overall social welfare.

Coordination mechanisms of closed-loop supply chain under cap-and-trade policy

Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation

Supply chain decisions and coordination with strategic customer behavior under cap-and-trade policy

Does the carbon trading mechanism affect social and environmental benefits of the retailer-led supply chain: Strategic decisions of emissions reduction and promotion

Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Based on Carbon Tax and Government Subsidy Policy

Optimal Decisions in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain considering Capacity Constraints and Stochastic Demand under the Cap-and-Trade Regulation

Pricing, carbon emission reduction, collection decision, and coordination in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain

Research on low-carbon supply chain decision-making under carbon cap-and-trade and subsidy policy

The Production Decisions and Cap Setting with Wholesale Price and Revenue Sharing Contracts under Cap-and-trade Regulation.

Cooperative decisions of competitive supply chains considering carbon trading mechanism

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different policies of government intervention

A low-carbon supply chain pricing mechanism considering CSR under carbon cap-and-trade policy

The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition

Optimal Decisions in a Multi-Party Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Green Marketing and Carbon Tax Policy

Supply chain coordination with buyback contract under different carbon emission policies

Optimizing emission reduction strategies in a two-echelon supply chain: a Stackelberg game perspective under cap-and-trade regulation

Impacts of Supply Chain Competition on Firms’ Carbon Emission Reduction and Social Welfare under Cap-and-Trade Regulation

Using Game Theory to Explore the Multinational Supply Chain Production Inventory Models of Various Carbon Emission Policy Combinations

Optimal Production and Carbon Emission Reduction Level under Cap-and-trade and Low Carbon Subsidy Policies

Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation

A Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Regulation