Look Up! An Eye-Tracking Study on Situation Awareness During Automated Vehicle Takeover
Nade Liang,Jing Yang,K. Prakah-Asante,Reates Curry,Mike Blommer,Radhakrishnan Swaminathan,Denny Yu,Brandon J. Pitts
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651146
2021-09-01
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Abstract:During intermediate driving (SAE Levels 2 and 3, SAE 2018), factors such as engagement in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) can negatively affect how well drivers can successfully assume their roles in such shared structures (Blommer et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). This is because controlling a semi-autonomous vehicle requires good understanding of what is happening in the surrounding environment, also known as situation awareness (SA). One approach to assess an individual’s SA is to determine whether task-relevant driving environment elements are perceived appropriately, and a common SA probing technique is the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) (Endsley, 1987). In addition, eye-tracking has been used to infer SA, and various metrics have been found to correlate with SA (Zhang et al., 2020). The general trend is that longer durations of visual attention allocation in a particular area of interest (AOI) appears to benefit SA, as operators tend to have more time to develop a better understanding of a task-related area. The objective of this study was to determine how the pretakeover attentional state of drivers, with respect to visual engagement in NDRTs, affects changes in SA after a takeover request (TOR) has been issued. We used a combination of direct (via SAGAT) and indirect (eye-tracking) SA measures. Our study was situated in a SAE Level 3 conditional automation context, but we did not focus on takeover performance. Instead, our goal was to characterize the impact of pre-takeover level of engagement on SA during a post-TOR period. A total of 30 participants were recruited for this study. This study used a medium-fidelity fixed-base driving simulator (miniSim). A within-subjects design was used (Figure 1). In the pre-TOR segment, three NDRT conditions were used: a Surrogate Reference Task (SuRT), a Peripheral Detection Task (PDT), and a monitoring task (Monitor). The three tasks were designed to have similar levels of workload, with the only difference being the visual engagement in the driving scene vs. NDRTs. In the post-TOR segment, drivers were required to fully attend to the driving scene, up until the termination of the drive seven seconds later, to allow restoration of their SA. A 19-item SAGAT questionnaire (SA probes) was then administered.