Abstract:Long before humans will completely trust fully automated vehicles, partial and conditional automation where the human driver is still in the loop will dominate the era of autonomous vehicles. However, more than 90% of traffic accidents are due to human errors, of which approximately half appear to be due to perceptual errors. Especially at busy and complex intersections that have a high density of visual stimuli. This poses a high demand for accurate measurement of the driver's situation awareness, for real-world driver monitoring. Eye tracking seems to be an ideal method to determine what the driver has or has not seen, since people tend to look at what they inquire information from. The main objective of this thesis assignment was therefore to develop a platform that combines the driver's gaze behaviour in combination with the vehicle's road scene perception, to set up a real-world driving experiment to gather such data on the road, and to come up with a proof of concept that gaze behaviour combined with situational knowledge can be predictive of SA. The platform developed consisted of an eye-tracker with four cameras constructed in the available Toyota Prius of the department of Intelligent Vehicles, which is equipped for self-driving. The driver's gaze was layered over the object identification data from the vehicle, to see which objects are looked at or fixated upon and which are not. A real-world driving experiment was then conducted in which participants (N = 14) performed a driving task and a recall task. The driving task consisted of 8 intersection crossings in which mostly left turns were made to manoeuvre the vehicle off a main priority road. After each crossing, the participants performed a recall task in which they had to select images of the object they encountered during the driving task. The results showed that 88.1% of all relevant objects they encountered were seen with central vision, of which 41.8% were recalled. The remainder 11.9% of all relevant objects that were not seen, have only been in peripheral view, of which 18.2% were recalled. These preliminary results indicate that at least 2.2% (18.2% of 11.9%) of relevant objects are perceived by the driver using peripheral vision. The variables seen, first saccade angle and first saccade moment contributed significantly to a prediction model that predicted whether a relevant object would be recalled by the driver. The variables fixation count, total glance duration and saccade count were not significant predictor variables. The conclusion was drawn that the results of this exploratory research confirmed that gaze behaviour combined with situational knowledge can be predictive of driver SA. However, a crucial recommendation for future research is an improved recall task procedure to obtain higher recall rates and therefore more accurate prediction of SA. This outcome could be of great value for future research and development of applications that assist or steer the driver's attention to possible threats or objects the driver is missing or not focusing on.

Driver's gaze behaviour before, during and after take-over manoeuvres: Influence of agentivity associated with different automation solutions

Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget

Driver Take-Over Behaviour Study Based on Gaze Focalization and Vehicle Data in CARLA Simulator

The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving

Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads

Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving

Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving

Urgent and non-urgent takeovers during conditional automated driving on public roads: The impact of different training programmes

Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality

Evaluation of Imminent Take-Over Requests With Real Automation on a Test Track

Exploring Driver Physiological Response During Level 3 Conditional Driving Automation

Get Ready for Take-Overs: Using Head-Up Display for Drivers to Engage in Non-Driving-Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles

Decoding Driver Takeover Behaviour in Conditional Automation with Immersive Virtual Reality

Takeover performance evaluation using driving simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Measuring driver perception during on-road eye-tracking: Combining gaze behaviour and vehicle’s road scene perception

Once a driver, always a driver - Manual driving style persists in automated driving takeover

“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?

Effects of Various In-Vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces on Drivers' Takeover Performance and Gaze Pattern in Conditionally Automated Vehicles

Drivers' situational awareness of surrounding vehicles during takeovers: Evidence from a driving simulator study

Influence of non-driving related tasks on driving performance after takeover transition in conditionally automated driving