Takeover Directly or Gradually? Comparison of Single Stage and Dual Stage Human-Machine Interface on Drivers’ Visual Behaviors and Subjective Ratings over Cognitive Demand, Motoric Demand, and Time Demand

Weimin Liu,Qingkun Li,Zhenyuan Wang,Wenjun Wang,Chao Zeng,Bo Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3538950.3538959
2022-01-01
Abstract:Human-Machine Interface (HMI) has its effectiveness for Level 3 automated vehicles in delivering messages from the automation system to drivers in the cabin, especially messages related to takeover. The present study aimed to compare single stage HMI which issues takeover request (TOR) directly with dual stage HMIs which provide countdown information and issue soft TOR (takeover request) and hard TOR subsequently to warn drivers of the upcoming takeover event. Upon issue of soft TOR, the driving system starts to countdown the automation availability in form of either or both countdowns (time-based, distance-based) but does not require manual intervention from the drivers. Hard TOR, however, would be used as a signal for necessary transfer of control authorities. A driving simulator-based experiment was conducted comparing the differences in drivers’ visual behaviors and post-experiment subjective ratings over cognitive demand, motoric demand, and time demand among single stage HMI and dual stage HMIs. Results of our experimental studies show that dual stage HMIs with countdown information effectively captured drivers’ visual attention, reflected by more fixations attended or shifted to countdown information. Moreover, the effectiveness of dual stage HMIs in lowering drivers’ subjective ratings over cognitive resource demand and the time requirement for better takeover are also shown from the developed multilinear regression models. We therefore conclude that, compared with single stage HMI, dual stage HMIs with countdown information can be more valid options to support drivers in both automated driving and takeover time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?