Cosmological parameters estimated from peculiar velocity – density comparisons: calibrating 2M++

Amber M Hollinger,Michael J Hudson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1042

IF: 4.8

2024-04-18

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract:Abstract Cosmological parameters can be measured by comparing peculiar velocities with those predicted from a galaxy density field. Previous work has tested the accuracy of this approach with N-body simulations, but generally on idealised mock galaxy surveys. However, systematic biases may arise solely due to survey selection effects such as flux-limited samples, edge-effects and complications due to the obscuration of the Galactic plane. In this work, we explore the impact of each of these effects individually as well as collectively using the semi-analytic models from numerical simulations to generate mock catalogues that mimic the 2M++ density field. We find the reconstruction and analysis methods used for our 2M++ mocks produce a value of fσ8 that is biased high by a factor 1.04 ± 0.01 compared to the true value. Moreover, a cosmic volume matching that of 2M++ has a cosmic variance uncertainty in fσ8 of $\sim 5~{{\%}}$. The systematic bias is a function of distance: it is unbiased close to the origin but is biased slightly high for distances in the range 100–180 h−1Mpc. Correcting for this small bias, we find that recent peculiar velocity samples yield $f\sigma _8^{\textrm {lin}} = 0.362\pm 0.023$, a value that is in tension with the extrapolations from cosmic microwave background measurements. The predicted peculiar velocities from 2M++ have an error of 170 km s−1 that slowly increases with distance, exceeding 200 km s−1 only at distances of 180-200 h−1Mpc. Finally, the residual bulk flow speeds found in previous work are shown to be not in conflict with those expected in the Λ cold dark matter model.

astronomy & astrophysics