Abstract:Galaxy clusters are the largest gravitating structures in the universe, and their mass assembly is sensitive to the underlying cosmology. Their mass function, baryon fraction, and mass distribution have been used to infer cosmological parameters despite the presence of systematics. However, the complexity of the scaling relations among galaxy cluster properties has never been fully exploited, limiting their potential as a cosmological probe. We propose the first machine learning (ML) method using galaxy cluster properties from hydrodynamical simulations in different cosmologies to predict cosmological parameters combining a series of canonical cluster observables, such as gas mass, gas bolometric luminosity, gas temperature, stellar mass, cluster radius, total mass, and velocity dispersion at different redshifts. The ML model was trained on mock ``measurements'' of these observable quantities from Magneticum multi-cosmology simulations to derive unbiased constraints on a set of cosmological parameters. These include the mass density parameter, $ the power spectrum normalization, $ the baryonic density parameter, $ and the reduced Hubble constant, $h_0$. We tested the ML model on catalogs of a few hundred clusters taken, in turn, from each simulation and found that the ML model can correctly predict the cosmology from where they have been picked. The cumulative accuracy depends on the cosmology, ranging from 21 to 75 . We demonstrate that this is sufficient to derive unbiased constraints on the main cosmological parameters with errors on the order of for $ for $ for $ and $ $ for $h_0$. This proof-of-concept analysis, though based on a limited variety of multi-cosmology simulations, shows that ML can efficiently map the correlations in the multidimensional space of the observed quantities to the cosmological parameter space and narrow down the probability that a given sample belongs to a given cosmological parameter combination. More large-volume, mid-resolution, multi-cosmology hydro-simulations need to be produced to expand the applicability to a wider cosmological parameter range. However, this first test is exceptionally promising, as it shows that these ML tools can be applied to cluster samples from multiwavelength observations from surveys such as Rubin/LSST, CSST, Euclid, and Roman in optical and near-infrared bands, and eROSITA in X-rays, to the constrain cosmology and effect of baryonic feedback.

Cosmology with velocity dispersion counts: an alternative to measuring cluster halo masses

NIHAO XII: Galactic Uniformity in a ΛCDM Universe

Cosmological measurements from void-galaxy and galaxy-galaxy clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

NIHAO X: Reconciling the Local Galaxy Velocity Function with Cold Dark Matter Via Mock H I Observations

Cosmological parameters estimated from velocity -- density comparisons: Calibrating 2M++

Distortions of the Hubble diagram: Line-of-sight signatures of local galaxy clusters

Galaxy Kinematics and Mass Calibration in Massive SZE Selected Galaxy Clusters to z=1.3

The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population

Cluster cosmology without cluster finding

Cluster cosmology redux: a compact representation for the halo mass function

Cluster Cosmology Redux: A Compact Model of the Halo Mass Function

KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Cosmological constraints from density-split clustering in the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample

Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing – III. Application to SDSS Data

Accurate Determination of Halo Velocity Bias in Simulations and Its Cosmological Implications

Cosmological parameters estimated from peculiar velocity – density comparisons: calibrating 2M++

Cosmology with galaxy cluster properties using machine learning

Galaxy Clusters in Hubble Volume Simulations: Cosmological Constraints from Sky Survey Populations

HeCS-SZ: The Hectospec Survey of Sunyaev-Zeldovich Selected Clusters

Closing the Gap between Observed Low-Mass Galaxy HI Kinematics and CDM Predictions