Abstract:Context. Upcoming surveys of the large-scale structure of our Universe will employ a large coverage area of about half of the sky and will significantly increase the observational depth. With these surveys, we will be able to cross-correlate cosmic microwave background (CMB) gravitational lensing and galaxy surveys divided into narrow redshift bins to map the evolution of the cosmological parameters with redshift. Aims. We study the effect of the redshift bin mismatch of objects that is due to photometric redshift errors in tomographic cross-correlation measurements. Methods. We used the code FLASK to create Monte Carlo simulations of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) and Planck CMB lensing convergence. We simulated log-normal fields and divided galaxies into nine redshift bins with the Gaussian and modified Lorentzian photometric redshift errors. To estimate the parameters, we used angular power spectra of CMB lensing and galaxy density contrast fields and the maximum likelihood estimation method. Results. We show that even with simple Gaussian errors with a standard deviation of σ ( z ) = 0.02(1 + z ), the galaxy auto-power spectra in tomographic bins are offset by 2 − 15%. The estimated cross-power spectra between galaxy clustering and CMB lensing are also biased, with smaller deviations < 5%. As a result, the σ 8 parameter deviates between 0.2 − 1.2 σ due to the redshift bin mismatch of the objects. We propose a computationally fast and robust method based on the scattering matrix approach to correct for the redshift bin mismatch of the objects. Conclusions. The estimates of the parameters in tomographic studies such as the linear galaxy bias, the cross-correlation amplitude, and σ 8 are biased due to the redshift bin mismatch of the objects. The biases in these parameters are alleviated with our scattering matrix approach.

Prospects for galaxy-mass relations from the 6dF Galaxy Survey

A local measurement of the growth rate from peculiar velocities and galaxy clustering correlations in the 6dF Galaxy Survey

Joint growth rate measurements from redshift-space distortions and peculiar velocities in the 6dF Galaxy Survey

Galaxy 2-Point Covariance Matrix Estimation for Next Generation Surveys

The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - VI. Measuring Lambda and Beta from Redshift-space Distortions in the Power Spectrum

Cosmological parameters estimated from peculiar velocity – density comparisons: calibrating 2M++

3D-Radial galaxy correlation function

Cosmological Fisher forecasts for next-generation spectroscopic surveys

Cosmological parameters estimated from velocity -- density comparisons: Calibrating 2M++

Using relativistic effects in large-scale structure to constrain astrophysical properties of galaxy populations

Present and Future Galaxy Redshift Surveys: ORS, DOGS and 2dF

Optimising Spectroscopic and Photometric Galaxy Surveys: Same-sky Benefits for Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

Comparing the SBF Survey Velocity Field with the Gravity Field from Redshift Surveys

Measuring Galaxy Abundance and Clustering at High Redshift from Incomplete Spectroscopic Data: Tests on Mock Catalogs

Constraining modified gravity scenarios with the 6dFGS and SDSS galaxy peculiar velocity data sets

Why multi-tracer surveys beat cosmic variance

The Pairwise Velocity Distribution Function of Galaxies in the LCRS, 2dF, and SDSS Redshift Surveys

Galaxy Bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data: Combining Galaxy Density Maps and Weak Lensing Maps

PAIRWISE VELOCITIES OF GALAXIES IN THE CFA AND SSRS2 REDSHIFT SURVEYS

Tomographic cross correlations between galaxy surveys and the CMB gravitational lensing potential