Abstract:With the development of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, many organizations try to introduce AI algorithms into the decision-making process to avoid the subjective inherent biases. Although AI algorithms improve the scientificity of decision-making, they also raise the issue of fairness in the decision-making process. Considering that employees are the direct subject of HR decision-making, how employees view and evaluate the fairness of AI algorithmic decision-making process is very important. However, researches on the above questions are rather limited.Based on the procedural fairness theory, this study discusses the impact of different decision-making subjects (AI algorithms vs. supervisors) on employees’ perception of fairness in the HR decision-making process. Through two experiments, we find that: (1) The decision-making of AI algorithms makes employees have a lower perception of procedural fairness than that of supervisors. (2) Information transparency mediates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. Employees believe that AI algorithmic decision-making has lower information transparency, which in turn produces a lower perception of procedural fairness. (3) Inclusive climate moderates the relationship between AI algorithmic decision-making and employees’ perception of procedural fairness. When employees perceive a high level of organizational inclusive climate, the effect of AI algorithmic decision-making on the perception of program fairness will be weakened.Overall, this study responds to the call for more research that bridges AI algorithmic decision-making and individual perception of procedural fairness by examining information transparency as a mediator and inclusive climate as a moderator in this relationship. The findings not only challenge the existing mainstream view that AI algorithmic decision-making does not exist a lower bias than human decision-making, but also offer useful advice to managers and provide implications for organizational HR decision-making practices in the digital and intelligent era.

Exploring Gender Bias and Algorithm Transparency: Ethical Considerations of AI in HRM

Ethical and Legal Challenges of AI in Human Resource Management

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices

The Dark Side of AI-HRM on Employees Based on Algorithmic Features

The dark side of AI-enabled HRM on employees based on AI algorithmic features

Introducing a multi-stakeholder perspective on opacity, transparency and strategies to reduce opacity in algorithm-based human resource management

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

Designing Fair AI in Human Resource Management: Understanding Tensions Surrounding Algorithmic Evaluation and Envisioning Stakeholder-Centered Solutions

Gender Bias in AI Recruitment Systems: A Sociological-and Data Science-based Case Study

Algorithmic discrimination: examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices

A systematic review of socio-technical gender bias in AI algorithms

Exploration, detection, and mitigation: Unveiling gender bias in NLP

Does biasedness starts with HR? - Analysis and outcomes and suggestions for transparent practices

Hiring Fairly in the Age of Algorithms

Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI's "Eradication of Difference"

AI employment decision-making: integrating the equal opportunity merit principle and explainable AI

Integrating Behavioral, Economic, and Technical Insights to Understand and Address Algorithmic Bias: A Human-Centric Perspective

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Ameliorating Algorithmic Bias, or Why Explainable AI Needs Feminist Philosophy

Towards Algorithmic Transparency: A Diversity Perspective.