Abstract:With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) based systems, a new era has begun. Decisions that were once made by humans are now increasingly being made by these advanced systems, with the inevitable consequence of our growing reliance on AI in many aspects of our lives. At the same time, the opaque nature of AI-based systems and the possibility of unintentional or hidden discriminatory practices and biases raises profound questions not only about the mechanics of AI, but also about how users perceive the fairness of these systems. We hypothesize that providing various explanations for AI decision-making processes and output may enhance users' fairness perceptions and make them trust the system and adopt its decisions. Hence, we devised an online between-subject experiment that explores users' fairness and comprehension perceptions of AI systems with respect to the explanations provided by the system, employing a case study of a managerial decision in the human resources (HR) domain. We manipulated (i) the decision-maker (AI or human); (ii) the input (candidate characteristics); (iii) the output (recommendation valence), and (iv) the explanation style. We examined the effect of the various manipulations (and individuals' demographic and personality characteristics) using multivariate ordinal regression. We also performed a multi-level analysis of experiment components to examine the effects of the decision-maker type, explanation style, and their combination. The results suggest three main conclusions. The first conclusion is that there is a gap in users' fairness and comprehension perception of AI-based decision making systems compared to human decision making. The second conclusion is that knowing that an AI-based system provided the decisions negatively affects users' fairness and comprehension perceptions, compared to knowing that humans made the decision. Finally, the third conclusion is that providing case-based, certification-based, or sensitivity-based explanations can narrow this gap and may even eliminate it. Additionally, we found that users' fairness and comprehension perceptions are influenced by a variety of factors such as the input, output, and explanation provided by the system, as well as by individuals' age, education, computer skills, and personality. Our findings may help to understand when and how to use explanations to improve users' perceptions regarding AI-based decision-making. CCS CONCEPTS • Human computer interaction (HCI) → HCI design and evaluation methods → User studies • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI) → Empirical studies in HCI • Applied computing → Law, social and behavioral sciences → Sociology

AI employment decision-making: integrating the equal opportunity merit principle and explainable AI

Modeling Epistemological Principles for Bias Mitigation in AI Systems: An Illustration in Hiring Decisions

Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices

Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI's "Eradication of Difference"

Fairness in AI-Driven Recruitment: Challenges, Metrics, Methods, and Future Directions

Who Made That Decision and Why? Users' Perceptions of Human Versus AI Decision-Making and the Power of Explainable-AI

Can AI Algorithmic Decision-making Improve Employees’ Perception of Procedural Fairness?

Fairness as a Determinant of AI Adoption in Recruiting: An Fairness as a Determinant of AI Adoption in Recruiting: An Interview-based Study Interview-based Study

Explaining how your AI system is fair

Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making

AI’s fairness problem: understanding wrongful discrimination in the context of automated decision-making

AI for hiring in context: a perspective on overcoming the unique challenges of employment research to mitigate disparate impact

Engineering Equity: How AI Can Help Reduce the Harm of Implicit Bias

From Bias to Fairness: A Review of Ethical Considerations and Mitigation Strategies in Artificial Intelligence

Ethical artificial intelligence (AI): confronting bias and discrimination in the library and information industry

Hiring Fairly in the Age of Algorithms

AI Fairness: from Principles to Practice

Interdisciplinary Expertise to Advance Equitable Explainable AI

A Comprehensive Review of AI Techniques for Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Job Hiring

Artificial Intelligence Decision Making and the infringement of human rights: Focusing on the recruitment process

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Replacing Humans in Making Human Resource Management Decisions on Fairness: A Case of Resume Screening