Abstract:There are widespread concerns about bias and discriminatory output related to artificial intelligence (AI), which may propagate social biases and disparities. Digital ageism refers to ageism reflected design, development, and implementation of AI systems and technologies and its resultant data. Currently, the prevalence of digital ageism and the sources of AI bias are unknown. A scoping review informed by the Arksey and O'Malley methodology was undertaken to explore age-related bias in AI systems, identify how AI systems encode, produce, or reinforce age-related bias, what is known about digital ageism, and the social, ethical and legal implications of age-related bias. A comprehensive search strategy that included five electronic bases and grey literature sources including legal sources was conducted. A framework of machine learning biases spanning from data to user by Mehrabi et al. is used to present the findings (Mehrabi et al. 2021). The academic search resulted in 7595 articles that were screened according to the inclusion criteria, of which 307 were included for full-text screening, and 49 were included in this review. The grey literature search resulted in 2639 documents screened, of which 235 were included for full text screening, and 25 were found to be relevant to the research questions pertaining to age and AI. As a result, a total of 74 documents were included in this review. The results show that the most common AI applications that intersected with age were age recognition and facial recognition systems. The most frequent machine learning algorithms used were convolutional neural networks and support vector machines. Bias was most frequently introduced in the early 'data to algorithm' phase in machine learning and the 'algorithm to user' phase specifically with representation bias ( n = 33) and evaluation bias ( n = 29), respectively (Mehrabi et al. 2021). The review concludes with a discussion of the ethical implications for the field of AI and recommendations for future research.

A systematic review of socio-technical gender bias in AI algorithms

Gender bias in AI-based decision-making systems: a systematic literature review

Feminist AI: Can We Expect Our AI Systems to Become Feminist?

Exploring gender biases in ML and AI academic research through systematic literature review

Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias

Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions

Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives

Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices

Age-related bias and artificial intelligence: a scoping review

Analyzing the European institutional response to ethical and regulatory challenges of artificial intelligence in addressing discriminatory bias

A Comprehensive Review of AI Techniques for Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Job Hiring

AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry

Addressing Bias and Fairness Issues in Artificial Intelligence

An analysis of gender bias studies in natural language processing

From Bias to Fairness: A Review of Ethical Considerations and Mitigation Strategies in Artificial Intelligence

Tech workers' perspectives on ethical issues in AI development: Foregrounding feminist approaches

Oxford Handbook on AI Ethics Book Chapter on Race and Gender

Thinking beyond Bias: Analyzing Multifaceted Impacts and Implications of AI on Gendered Labour

AI and the quest for diversity and inclusion: a systematic literature review

"My Kind of Woman": Analysing Gender Stereotypes in AI through The Averageness Theory and EU Law

Revisiting Technical Bias Mitigation Strategies