Abstract:Poorer citizens generally participate less in politics; at the same time, the income-based gap in participation is not the same across democracies. Whereas in Denmark in 1977 turnout among poorer citizens was 6 percentage points higher than among wealthier ones, in the United States in 1988 the gap is reversed: turnout among wealthier Americans is 31 percentage points higher than among their poorer peers. Existing attempts at understanding the sources of this variation point to macro-level factors, such as compulsory voting, ballot complexity, or income inequality (Gallego, 2015; Solt, 2008). Though important, we argue that existing accounts aren't successful in explaining temporal variation in this participation gap, over periods of time in which the institutional framework is stable. We propose instead a largely neglected, yet plausible, reason for why a differential effect of income on political participation exists: the characteristics of the welfare state. In addition to providing resources relevant to participation, welfare state arrangements also create political constituencies that can be mobilized around a shared goal by political entrepreneurs. Building on Schneider and Makszin's (2014) education-based analysis we inductively develop, with the use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), various welfare regime types that condition patterns of income-based participatory inequality in democracies. These are produced based on an original data set of roughly 150 merged surveys from 19 OECD members, between 1960 and 2010. We label these types the supportive and mobilizing welfare regimes, along with their non-mobilizing and non-supportive counterparts. These welfare state regimes correspond to different mechanisms through which welfare state characteristics shape participatory patterns: (1) resource endowments available to individuals for participation and (2) unions' and parties' ability to politically mobilize and inform their members. We complement our aggregate-level QCA analysis with individual-level tests of these hypothesized mechanisms. Relying on six cross-national survey programs, such as the European Social Survey or the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, we find consistent support for the mobilization-based mechanisms, while revealing mixed evidence that they also spill over into attitudinal factors which underpin participation. Only weaker evidence is found for our resource-based mechanisms. Overall, our results indicate the effect of welfare state characteristics on political participation gaps in advanced industrial democracies. Welfare state reforms, and in particular retrenchment, are likely to have (damaging) consequences for democracy.

Replicating the Nordic welfare model: policy prescriptions that recognize the cultural antecedents of solidarity

Cultural Traditions and the Scandinavian Social Policy Model

Reciprocity or community: Different cultural pathways to cooperation and welfare

REPORT: WELFARE STATE MODEL – NORDIC EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES IN LITHUANIA

Adapting the Nordic welfare state model to the challenges of automation

Oscillating meanings of the Nordic model: ideas and the welfare state in Finland and Sweden

Revisiting the Nordic long-term care model for older people-still equal?

The Nordic Model on the Global Market of Ideas: The Welfare State as Scandinavia’s Best Brand

Welfare Reforms in the Nordic Countries:Policy Implementation,Performances and Institutional Constraints

Do shared values promote social cohesion? If so, which? Evidence from Denmark

Theoretical Visions Versus Policymaking Realities? Searching For The Logical Grounds Of Expansion And Retrenchment Arguments In Studies On Nordic Social Policy Models From The 1960s To The 2000s

Weakly institutionalized, heavily contested: Does support for contemporary welfare reforms rely on norms of distributive justice?

Child Care and Parental Leave in the Nordic Countries: A Model to Aspire to?

Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution

Shared Care and Child Maintenance Policies in Nordic Countries

Co-Constitution of Domestic and International Welfare Obligations

Whose responsibility? Elder support norms regarding the provision and financing of assistance with daily activities across economically developed countries

Welfare States Matter for Democracy: Income-based Participatory Inequality in Post-WW 2 Western Democracies

The COVID-19 crisis and policy responses by continental European welfare states

Relational Political Culture: A Critique of Inglehart's Post-Materialist Thesis

Cultural values and population health: a quantitative analysis of variations in cultural values, health behaviours and health outcomes among 42 European countries