Abstract:Sweden was an important pioneer of market-oriented reform in publicly funded health-care systems. Yet by the mid-1990s the county councils, which fund and manage most health-care, had substantially scaled back reforms based on provider competition while continuing to constrain health budgets. As policy makers faced new issues, they turned increasingly to longer-term and more cooperative contracts to define relations between hospitals and the county councils. Growing regionalization of government and hospital mergers further reconfigured acute care and limited opportunities for competition between hospitals. We seek to explain this reorientation of market-oriented reforms between 1989 and 1996 in terms of shifts in the positions taken by powerful policy actors, and in particular by county council politicians. During this period, elections moved liberal and conservative politicians, who were the most enthusiastic supporters of market-oriented reform, in and out of control of most county governments. Meanwhile many Social Democratic politicians gradually turned from initial support of competitive reform toward opposition. Politicians and county administrators from all parties were particularly concerned about controlling health expenditures during a period of recession. In addition, the public, politicians in the counties and municipalities, and health professionals resisted steps that threatened health sector employment and would have allowed market mechanisms, rather than governments, to determine the prices and distribution of health services. During the years under study Sweden's market-oriented reforms followed a course of development similar to that taken by other management and policy fashions (Abrahamson E. Management fashion, Academy of Management Review 1996;21: 254-85). At first the reforms enjoyed uncritical support by a broad spectrum of stakeholders. Gradually participants in the reform process recognized inherent tensions among the goals of the reform, conflicts between reform programs and fundamental social and political values, unrealistic assumptions about the effects of competition, technical and organizational obstacles to implementation, and threats to interest groups. Since 1998, there have been indications that Sweden may be entering yet another stage of experimentation with market-oriented reform.

Welfare Reforms in the Nordic Countries:Policy Implementation,Performances and Institutional Constraints

Theoretical Visions Versus Policymaking Realities? Searching For The Logical Grounds Of Expansion And Retrenchment Arguments In Studies On Nordic Social Policy Models From The 1960s To The 2000s

Revisiting the Nordic long-term care model for older people-still equal?

Reform Agenda For The Building Of Service-Oriented Government In China: Implications From Welfare Regime Analysis

Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments

Reforms of higher education and research in the Nordic countries: global trends and Nordic models in Academia

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

Replicating the Nordic welfare model: policy prescriptions that recognize the cultural antecedents of solidarity

Weakly institutionalized, heavily contested: Does support for contemporary welfare reforms rely on norms of distributive justice?

"Welfare Society":A Social Ideal Or A Policy Model?

Women and Social Policies--On Changes of Women's Status in North European Countries

Progress in the Study of ″East Asian Welfare Model″ and Its Problems

Adapting the Nordic welfare state model to the challenges of automation

Quasi-Market Regulation in Early Childhood Education and Care: Does a Nordic Welfare Dimension Prevail?

Social Policymaking and Its Institutional Basis: Transition of the Chinese Social Security System

The Swedish pension system after twenty years

China’s Public Service System:Developments of Social Policy, Institution and Mechanism

Repositioning Three Models of Social Policy with Reference to East Asian Welfare Systems

The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care

Why institutions are not the only thing that matters: twenty-five years of health care reform in New Zealand

Implementation of community care policy in the United Kingdom: will it be achieved?