Abstract:Background Current clinical balance assessment tools do not aim to help therapists identify the underlying postural control systems responsible for poor functional balance. By identifying the disordered systems underlying balance control, therapists can direct specific types of intervention for different types of balance problems. Objective The goal of this study was to develop a clinical balance assessment tool that aims to target 6 different balance control systems so that specific rehabilitation approaches can be designed for different balance deficits. This article presents the theoretical framework, interrater reliability, and preliminary concurrent validity for this new instrument, the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest). Design The BESTest consists of 36 items, grouped into 6 systems: “Biomechanical Constraints,” “Stability Limits/Verticality,” “Anticipatory Postural Adjustments,” “Postural Responses,” “Sensory Orientation,” and “Stability in Gait.” Methods In 2 interrater trials, 22 subjects with and without balance disorders, ranging in age from 50 to 88 years, were rated concurrently on the BESTest by 19 therapists, students, and balance researchers. Concurrent validity was measured by correlation between the BESTest and balance confidence, as assessed with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Results Consistent with our theoretical framework, subjects with different diagnoses scored poorly on different sections of the BESTest. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interrater reliability for the test as a whole was .91, with the 6 section ICCs ranging from .79 to .96. The Kendall coefficient of concordance among raters ranged from .46 to 1.00 for the 36 individual items. Concurrent validity of the correlation between the BESTest and the ABC Scale was r=.636, P<.01. Limitations Further testing is needed to determine whether: (1) the sections of the BESTest actually detect independent balance deficits, (2) other systems important for balance control should be added, and (3) a shorter version of the test is possible by eliminating redundant or insensitive items. Conclusions The BESTest is easy to learn to administer, with excellent reliability and very good validity. It is unique in allowing clinicians to determine the type of balance problems to direct specific treatments for their patients. By organizing clinical balance test items already in use, combined with new items not currently available, the BESTest is the most comprehensive clinical balance tool available and warrants further development.

Structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia: A Rasch analysis study

Insights Into the Mini-BESTest Scoring System: Comparison of 6 Different Structural Models

Validity of the Star Excursion Balance Test as an assessment of the balance ability for community-dwelling elderly people

Reliability of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest for assessing patients with incomplete spinal cord injury

Reliability and Validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in People With Subacute Stroke

Pooled Minimal Clinically Important Differences of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Patients with Early Subacute Stroke: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Berg Balance Scale Improves Measurement Efficiency Without Compromising Precision in People With Stroke

Digital Measures of Postural Sway Quantify Balance Deficits in Spinocerebellar Ataxia

The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits

Balance function in critical illness survivors and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest

A Comparative Severity Assessment of Impaired Balance due to Cerebellar Ataxia using Regression Models

The validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test

Psychometric Validation of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Reproducibility of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and the Mini-BESTest in school-aged children

Reliability of the Instrumented Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance Using a Virtual Balance Device

Usefulness of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale in inpatient rehabilitation: a retrospective validation study

Balance Error Scoring System in the assessment of chronic ankle stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Quantitative assessment of postural instability in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 patients

Psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test and physical function measures in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders

Reliability of the balance error scoring system in a population with protracted recovery from mild traumatic brain injury

Berg Balance Scale is a Valid Measure for Plan Interventions and for Assessing Changes in Postural Balance in Patients with Stroke