Intraoperative Device Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defect with a Right Anterior Minithoracotomy in 100 Patients.
Li Hongxin,Guo Wenbin,Sheng Lijun,Wang Zhengjun,Liang Hao,Zou Chengwei,Du Liang,Yuan Guidao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.002
IF: 6.439
2007-01-01
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:This study aims to report our experience using intraoperative device closure of secundum atrial septal defects and to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcome of this technique.METHODS:One hundred patients with secundum atrial septal defects (mean age, 29 +/- 16 years; age range, 5-71 years; mean weight, 54 +/- 18 kg; weight range, 16-94 kg) underwent intraoperative device closure through a right minithoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass and fluoroscopy. A 2.5- to 3-cm parasternal or submammary incision was made in the right third or fourth intercostal space. Exposed with a miniretractor, a specially designed plastic sheath loaded with the device was inserted through the purse-string sutures placed on the right atrium. Under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance, it was advanced through the atrial septal defect into the left atrium, and the device was deployed in place.RESULTS:The procedure was successful in all patients, including 5 patients with double atrial septal defects. The maximum diameter of the atrial septal defect ranged from 5 to 37 mm (mean, 21 +/- 7 mm). There were 61 patients with an atrial septal defect diameter of more than 20 mm, 16 of them with a diameter of more than 30 mm. The mean size of implanted devices was 25 +/- 7 mm (range, 8-36 mm). Residual shunts were found in 9 (9%) patients immediately after the operation. The complete occlusion rate was 95% at discharge, 99% at the 3-month follow-up, and 100% at the 1-year follow-up. There were no other late complications during the follow-up period.CONCLUSIONS:Intraoperative device closure is a safe, cost-effective, cosmetic, and less-invasive operation of most secundum atrial septal defects. Follow-up results are encouraging. It can be considered an acceptable alternative to transcatheter closure or surgical repair.