Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

Comparison of GATK and DeepVariant by trio sequencing

Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

In-Depth Comparison of Somatic Point Mutation Callers Based on Different Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Depth Data

Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery

3-14-2019 Similarities and Differences Between Variants Called With Human Reference Genome HG 19 or HG 38

Comparative Analysis for the Performance of Variant Calling Pipelines on Detecting the De Novo Mutations in Humans

Sentieon DNASeq Variant Calling Workflow Demonstrates Strong Computational Performance and Accuracy

A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference

Systematic evaluation of de novo mutation calling tools using whole genome sequencing data

Computational performance and accuracy of Sentieon DNASeq variant calling workflow

A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

Automated Identification of Germline de novo Mutations in Family Trios: A Consensus-Based Informatic Approach

A Benchmark of Genetic Variant Calling Pipelines Using Metagenomic Short-Read Sequencing

Automated Identification of Germline Mutations in Family Trios: A Consensus-Based Informatic Approach

Variant calling pipelines for whole exome sequencing in clinical context

A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree

Benchmarking of Germline Copy Number Variant Callers from Whole Genome Sequencing Data for Clinical Applications

Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data