Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data

Benchmarking UMI-aware and standard variant callers for low frequency ctDNA variant detection

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis

Enhanced Error Suppression for Accurate Detection of Low‐Frequency Variants

High efficiency error suppression for accurate detection of low-frequency variants

In-Depth Comparison of Somatic Point Mutation Callers Based on Different Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Depth Data

A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree

BayVarC: an ultra-sensitive ctDNA variant caller using Bayesian approach

Comparative Analysis for the Performance of Variant Calling Pipelines on Detecting the De Novo Mutations in Humans

LFMD: a new likelihood-based method to detect low-frequency mutations without molecular tags

Psi-Caller: A Lightweight Short Read-Based Variant Caller with High Speed and Accuracy

Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery

Comparative evaluation of SNVs, indels, and structural variations detected with short- and long-read sequencing data

cascAGS: Comparative Analysis of SNP Calling Methods for Human Genome Data in the Absence of Gold Standard

Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data

Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation

Performance comparison of SNP detection tools with illumina exome sequencing data—an assessment using both family pedigree information and sample-matched SNP array data

Evaluating Bioinformatics Processing of Somatic Variant Detection in cfDNA Using Targeted Sequencing with UMIs