Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

In-Depth Comparison of Somatic Point Mutation Callers Based on Different Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing Depth Data

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Copy Number Variation Calling Using Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers

Towards an Accurate and Robust Analysis Pipeline for Somatic Mutation Calling

Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis

An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines of target genome sequencing cross multiple next-generation sequencers

Evaluation of Somatic Copy Number Estimation Tools for Whole-Exome Sequencing Data

Comparison of somatic mutation calling tools for second generation sequencing

Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data

Evaluating Bioinformatics Processing of Somatic Variant Detection in cfDNA Using Targeted Sequencing with UMIs

Somatic Point Mutation Calling in Low Cellularity Tumors

A Comparison of Structural Variant Calling from Short-Read and Nanopore-Based Whole-Genome Sequencing Using Optical Genome Mapping as a Benchmark

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

Abstract P19: Comprehensive Benchmark of Somatic Mutation Callers on Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Data in Cancer Liquid Biopsy

Evaluation of three read-depth based CNV detection tools using whole-exome sequencing data

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Exomehmm: A Hidden Markov Model for Detecting Copy Number Variation Using Whole-Exome Sequencing Data

SAAS-CNV: A Joint Segmentation Approach on Aggregated and Allele Specific Signals for the Identification of Somatic Copy Number Alterations with Next-Generation Sequencing Data.