Abstract:Background: High-throughput sequencing has rapidly become an essential part of precision cancer medicine. But validating results obtained from analyzing and interpreting genomic data remains a rate-limiting factor. The gold standard, of course, remains manual validation by expert panels, which is not without its weaknesses, namely high costs in both funding and time as well as the necessarily selective nature of manual validation. But it may be possible to develop more economical, complementary means of validation. In this study we employed four synthetic data sets (variants with known mutations spiked into specific genomic locations) of increasing complexity to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of five open-source variant callers: FreeBayes v1.0, VarDict v11.5.1, MuTect v1.1.7, MuTect2, and MuSE v1.0rc. FreeBayes, VarDict, and MuTect were run in bcbio-next gen, and the results were integrated into a single Ensemble call set. The known mutations provided a level of "ground truth" against which we evaluated variant-caller performance. We further facilitated the comparison and evaluation by segmenting the whole genome into 10,000,000 base-pair fragments which yielded 316 segments. Results: Differences among the numbers of true positives were small among the callers, but the numbers of false positives varied much more when the tools were used to analyze sets one through three. Both FreeBayes and VarDict produced strikingly more false positives than did the others, although VarDict, somewhat paradoxically also produced the highest number of true positives. The Ensemble approach yielded results characterized by higher specificity and balanced accuracy and fewer false positives than did any of the five tools used alone. Sensitivity and specificity, however, declined for all five callers as the complexity of the data sets increased, but we did not uncover anything more than limited, weak correlations between caller performance and certain DNA structural features: gene density and guanine-cytosine content. Altogether, MuTect2 performed the best among the callers tested, followed by MuSE and MuTect. Conclusions: Spiking data sets with specific mutations -single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or structural variations (SVs) in this study-at known locations in the genome provides an effective and economical way to compare data analyzed by variant callers with ground truth. The method constitutes a viable alternative to the prolonged, expensive, and noncomprehensive assessment by expert panels. It should be further developed and refined, as should other comparatively "lightweight" methods of assessing accuracy. Given that the scientific community has not yet established gold standards for validating NGS-related technologies such as variant callers, developing multiple alternative means for verifying variant-caller accuracy will eventually lead to the establishment of higher-quality standards than could be achieved by prematurely limiting the range of innovative methods explored by members of the community.

cascAGS: Comparative Analysis of SNP Calling Methods for Human Genome Data in the Absence of Gold Standard

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Systematic Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection Methods from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation

Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery

Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis

A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data

Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

A Benchmark of Genetic Variant Calling Pipelines Using Metagenomic Short-Read Sequencing

Evaluation of Copy Number Variation Detection for a SNP Array Platform

Comprehensive Assessment of Isoform Detection Methods for Third-Generation Sequencing Data

Copy Number Aberrations from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 Genotyping Data-How Accurate Are Commonly Used Prediction Approaches?

SNP Calling Using Genotype Model Selection on High-Throughput Sequencing Data

Snp Detection for Massively Parallel Whole-Genome Resequencing

Integrating sequencing datasets to form highly confident SNP and indel genotype calls for a whole human genome

A New Genotype Calling Method for Affymetrix SNP Arrays.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Variant Genotyping Methods Based on Long-Read Sequencing Data.

Pscc: Sensitive And Reliable Population-Scale Copy Number Variation Detection Method Based On Low Coverage Sequencing

GcnSV: A Method Based on Deep Learning of Calling Structural Variations from the Third-Generation Sequencing Data

Towards Better Understanding of Artifacts in Variant Calling from High-Coverage Samples