X. Wan,W. J. Kossler,C. E. Stronach,D. R. Noakes
Abstract:Zero-field muon spin relaxation (ZF-$\mu $SR) data for dilute spin magnetic systems have been widely interpreted with what is called a Kubo-Toyabe form based on a Lorentzian distribution of local field components. We derive here the proper magnetic field \textit{magnitude} distribution using independent and uncorrelated \textit{component} distributions. Our result is then compared to the previously accepted formula for ZF-$\mu $SR. We discuss the origins of the magnetic field component and magnitude distributions. Further we found that after rescaling the magnetic field, the differences that are amenable to experimental examination are quite small, although the interpretations behind them are quite different.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the understanding and modeling of the local field distribution generated by the magnetic field in the zero - field μSR (Zero - Field Muon Spin Relaxation) technique. Specifically, researchers usually use the so - called Kubo - Toyabe form to interpret these experimental data, which is based on the local field component of the Lorentz distribution. However, the goal of this paper is to derive the correct magnetic field intensity distribution corresponding to the independent and uncorrelated magnetic field component distributions and compare it with the previously widely accepted formula.
### Research Background
In the study of sparse spin magnetic systems, the zero - field muon spin relaxation (ZF - µSR) technique is widely used to study the local magnetic field distribution in rare - earth metal alloys, spin glasses, heavy fermion systems, superconducting compounds, and other magnetic systems. It is generally believed that in the sparse limit, the distribution of local magnetic field components is of the Cauchy or Lorentzian - like type:
\[ g(B_i)=\frac{1}{\pi\alpha}\frac{\alpha^2}{\alpha^2 + B_i^2} \]
where \( B_i = B_x, B_y, B_z \), and \( \alpha \) is the half - width at half - maximum (HWHM).
On the other hand, from the study of randomly distributed sparse magnetic impurity systems, it is concluded that the distribution of internal magnetic field intensity is expected to be:
\[ P(|B|)=\frac{4}{\pi\Gamma}\frac{|B|^2}{(\Gamma^2 + |B|^2)^2} \]
Therefore, the zero - field muon spin relaxation function takes the Lorentzian Kubo - Toyabe form:
\[ G_z(t)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2}{3}(1 - \lambda t)e^{-\lambda t} \]
where \( \lambda=\gamma_\mu\Gamma \), and \( \gamma_\mu \) is the gyromagnetic ratio of the muon, which is approximately \( 2\pi\times13.554 \, \text{kHz/G} \).
### Main Contributions of the Paper
In this paper, the authors derive the form of the magnetic field intensity distribution when the magnetic field components are independent and uncorrelated, and compare it with the previously widely accepted formula. They find that if the magnetic field components are assumed to be independent and uncorrelated, the magnetic field intensity distribution is:
\[ P_c(|B|)=\frac{12 |B|}{\alpha^2\pi^2}\frac{\arctan\left(\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2+\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^4\right)}{\left(\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2 + 3\right)\sqrt{2+\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2}} \]
Through detailed mathematical derivations, the authors prove this new magnetic field intensity distribution formula and point out that although it is very different in form from the previous formula, they are very close numerically, so that it is very difficult to distinguish experimentally which formula is more accurate.
### Conclusions
The main conclusion of the paper is that although the new magnetic field intensity distribution formula is theoretically different from the previous formula, their differences in practical applications are very small and difficult to distinguish by experimental means. In addition, the authors also discuss the relationship between the magnetic field component distribution and the magnetic field intensity distribution, pointing out that there is no one - to - one mapping relationship between these two distributions, but they are affected by different causal relationships. This indicates that when interpreting the zero - field muon spin relaxation experimental data, more careful selection and understanding of the theoretical models used are required.