Jianxia Ning,Indrajeet Singh,H. Madhyastha,S. Krishnamurthy,G. Cao,P. Mohapatra
Abstract:Recently, there have been proposals to evade censors by using steganography to embed secret messages in images shared on public photo-sharing sites. However, establishing a covert channel in this manner is not straightforward. First, photo-sharing sites often process uploaded images, thus destroying any embedded message. Second, prior work assumes the existence of an out-of-band channel, using which the communicating users can exchange metadata or secret keys a priori; establishing such out-of-band channels, not monitored by censors, is difficult. In this paper, we address these issues to facilitate private communications on photo-sharing sites. In doing so, first, we conduct an in-depth measurement study of the feasibility of hiding data on four popular photo-sharing sites. Second, based on the understanding derived, we propose a novel approach for embedding secret messages in uploaded photos while preserving the integrity of such messages. We demonstrate that, despite the processing on photo-sharing sites, our approach ensures reliable covert communication, without increasing the likelihood of being detected via steganalysis. Lastly, we design and implement a scheme for bootstrapping private communications without an out-of-band channel, i.e., by exchanging keys via uploaded images.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the understanding and modeling of the local field distribution generated by the magnetic field in the zero - field μSR (Zero - Field Muon Spin Relaxation) technique. Specifically, researchers usually use the so - called Kubo - Toyabe form to interpret these experimental data, which is based on the local field component of the Lorentz distribution. However, the goal of this paper is to derive the correct magnetic field intensity distribution corresponding to the independent and uncorrelated magnetic field component distributions and compare it with the previously widely accepted formula.
### Research Background
In the study of sparse spin magnetic systems, the zero - field muon spin relaxation (ZF - µSR) technique is widely used to study the local magnetic field distribution in rare - earth metal alloys, spin glasses, heavy fermion systems, superconducting compounds, and other magnetic systems. It is generally believed that in the sparse limit, the distribution of local magnetic field components is of the Cauchy or Lorentzian - like type:
\[ g(B_i)=\frac{1}{\pi\alpha}\frac{\alpha^2}{\alpha^2 + B_i^2} \]
where \( B_i = B_x, B_y, B_z \), and \( \alpha \) is the half - width at half - maximum (HWHM).
On the other hand, from the study of randomly distributed sparse magnetic impurity systems, it is concluded that the distribution of internal magnetic field intensity is expected to be:
\[ P(|B|)=\frac{4}{\pi\Gamma}\frac{|B|^2}{(\Gamma^2 + |B|^2)^2} \]
Therefore, the zero - field muon spin relaxation function takes the Lorentzian Kubo - Toyabe form:
\[ G_z(t)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2}{3}(1 - \lambda t)e^{-\lambda t} \]
where \( \lambda=\gamma_\mu\Gamma \), and \( \gamma_\mu \) is the gyromagnetic ratio of the muon, which is approximately \( 2\pi\times13.554 \, \text{kHz/G} \).
### Main Contributions of the Paper
In this paper, the authors derive the form of the magnetic field intensity distribution when the magnetic field components are independent and uncorrelated, and compare it with the previously widely accepted formula. They find that if the magnetic field components are assumed to be independent and uncorrelated, the magnetic field intensity distribution is:
\[ P_c(|B|)=\frac{12 |B|}{\alpha^2\pi^2}\frac{\arctan\left(\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2+\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^4\right)}{\left(\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2 + 3\right)\sqrt{2+\left(\frac{|B|}{\alpha}\right)^2}} \]
Through detailed mathematical derivations, the authors prove this new magnetic field intensity distribution formula and point out that although it is very different in form from the previous formula, they are very close numerically, so that it is very difficult to distinguish experimentally which formula is more accurate.
### Conclusions
The main conclusion of the paper is that although the new magnetic field intensity distribution formula is theoretically different from the previous formula, their differences in practical applications are very small and difficult to distinguish by experimental means. In addition, the authors also discuss the relationship between the magnetic field component distribution and the magnetic field intensity distribution, pointing out that there is no one - to - one mapping relationship between these two distributions, but they are affected by different causal relationships. This indicates that when interpreting the zero - field muon spin relaxation experimental data, more careful selection and understanding of the theoretical models used are required.