Microscopic diffusion and subdwarfs

P. Morel,A. Baglin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9902160

1999-02-11

Abstract:The recent distance determinations by HIPPARCOS have allowed to locate very precisely a reasonable set of subdwarfs in the HR diagram. A detailed comparison with evolutionary models is now possible and it has been recently claimed that the observed lower part of the main-sequence is cooler than the computed one. In this paper we show that microscopic diffusion could be the physical explanation of such a systematic shift. We emphazise the fact that, as diffusion alters surface abundances, the initial metal content of the stellar material is higher than the present one. A "calibration" procedure is necessary when comparing observed and theoretical HR diagram, to take into account this effect.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in the Hertzsprung - Russell diagram (HR diagram), the observed lower part of the subdwarf main sequence is cooler than the results of theoretical calculations. Specifically, the recent distance measurement results obtained by the HIPPARCOS satellite have made the positions of subdwarfs in the HR diagram more accurate, so that a detailed comparison with the evolutionary models can be made. However, this comparison has revealed a problem: the effective temperature of the observed main - sequence stars is lower than that predicted by the theoretical models.

To solve this problem, the author proposes that microscopic diffusion may be the physical cause of this systematic offset. Microscopic diffusion refers to the stratification phenomenon of elements inside a star due to gravitational settling and radiation forces. As the star ages, this diffusion effect will lead to a decrease in the surface metallicity, thus changing the effective temperature and luminosity of the star.

### Key point summary:

1. **Problem description**:
- The observed lower part of the subdwarf main sequence is cooler than that predicted by the theoretical model.
- This difference may stem from the influence of microscopic diffusion on the star's structure and evolution.

2. **The role of microscopic diffusion**:
- Microscopic diffusion will lead to a decrease in the surface metallicity of the star because heavier elements will sink towards the interior of the star.
- This change will affect the effective temperature and luminosity of the star, causing its position in the HR diagram to shift.

3. **Calibration process**:
- In order to accurately compare the observed data with the theoretical model, it is necessary to calibrate the initial metal content.
- The calibration process takes into account the influence of the diffusion effect on the surface metallicity to ensure that the theoretical model can better fit the observed data.

4. **Research method**:
- The paper uses star models with different metal contents and masses, and calculates the cases with and without microscopic diffusion respectively.
- By comparing the evolutionary trajectories of these models, the influence of microscopic diffusion on the star's structure and HR diagram position is evaluated.

5. **Conclusion**:
- Microscopic diffusion does cause a decrease in the effective temperature of the star, especially in the case of low metal content.
- However, although this effect helps to explain part of the differences between the observations and the theory, it may not be sufficient to completely eliminate all the inconsistencies.

### Formula examples:

- Relationship between the initial metallicity and the observed metallicity:
\[
[Fe/H] = \log\left(\frac{Z_{Fe}}{Z}\right) + \log\left(\frac{Z}{X}\right) - \log\left(\frac{Z_{Fe}}{X}\right)_\odot
\]
where \( Z_{Fe} \) is the mass ratio of iron, \( Z \) is the mass ratio of heavy elements, \( X \) is the mass ratio of hydrogen, and the subscript \(\odot\) represents the solar value.

- Change in the mean molecular weight:
\[
\mu \simeq \left(2X + \frac{3}{4}Y + Z\right)^{-1}
\]
\[
d\mu \simeq -\mu^2 \left(\frac{5}{4}dX + \frac{dZ}{2}\right)
\]

Through these analyses, the author hopes that microscopic diffusion can become an important mechanism for explaining the differences between the observations and the theory, and provide a basis for further research.