Abstract:Local social interactions among individuals in animal groups generate collective behavior, allowing groups to adjust to changing conditions. Historically, scientists from different disciplines have taken different approaches to modeling collective behavior. We describe how each can contribute to the goal of understanding natural systems. Simple bottom-up models that describe individuals and their interactions directly have demonstrated that local interactions far from equilibrium can generate collective states. However, such simple models are not likely to describe accurately the actual mechanisms and interactions in play in any real biological system. Other classes of top-down models that describe group-level behavior directly have been proposed for groups where the function of the collective behavior is understood. Such models cannot necessarily explain why or how such functions emerge from first principles. Because modeling approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and no single approach will always be best, we argue that models of collective behavior that are aimed at understanding real biological systems should be formulated to address specific questions and to allow for validation. As examples, we discuss four forms of collective behavior that differ both in the interactions that produce the collective behavior and in ecological context, and thus require very different modeling frameworks. 1) Harvester ants use local interactions consisting of brief antennal contact, in which one ant assesses the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of another, to regulate foraging activity, which can be modeled as a closed-loop excitable system. 2) Arboreal turtle ants form trail networks in the canopy of the tropical forest, using trail pheromone; one ant detects the volatile chemical that another has recently deposited. The process that maintains and repairs the trail, which can be modeled as a distributed algorithm, is constrained by the physical configuration of the network of vegetation in which they travel. 3) Swarms of midges interact acoustically and non-locally, and can be well described as agents moving in an emergent potential well that is representative of the swarm as a whole rather than individuals. 4) Flocks of jackdaws change their effective interactions depending on ecological context, using topological distance when traveling but metric distance when mobbing. We discuss how different research questions about these systems have led to different modeling approaches.

A simple model for the formation of a complex organism

Evolution Model Based on the Control of Gene Expression

How morphology of artificial organisms influences their evolution

Self assembly of a model multicellular organism resembling the Dictyostelium slime molds

A Two-Level Model for the Role of Complex and Young Genes in the Formation of Organism Complexity and New Insights into the Relationship Between Evolution and Development.

A mathematical framework for understanding the spontaneous emergence of complexity applicable to growing multicellular systems

A complex social structure with fission-fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model

ON THE EVOLUTION OF DIFFERENTIATED MULTICELLULARITY

Mechanistic interactions as the origin of modularity in biological networks

Goals and Limitations of Modeling Collective Behavior in Biological Systems

Life history evolution and the origin of multicellularity: differentiation of types, energy constraints, non-linear curvatures of trade-off functions

The Network Species Model

Ants, robots, humans: a self-organizing, complex systems modeling approach

A simple individual-based population growth model with limited resources

Simulation of the Evolution of Genomic Complexity

A dynamic network model predicts the phenotypes of multicellular clusters from cellular properties

Self-organized multicellular structures from simple cell signaling: a computational model

Multi-scale organization in communicating active matter

Multiscale Structure in Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics

Division of labour and the evolution of multicellularity