Abstract:Abstract Background Deliberative engagement techniques and citizens’ juries are touted as means of incorporating the public into policy decision-making, managing community expectations and increasing commitment to public health policy. This paper reports a study to examine the feasibility of citizens’ juries as a means of collecting data to inform public health policy related to food regulation through evaluation of the conduct of a citizens’ jury. Methods A citizens’ jury was conducted with a representative sample of 17 South Australians to explore their willingness to consider the proposition that food and drink advertising and/or sponsorship should be banned at children’s sporting events. Results The results showed that, in relation to the central proposition and evaluation data from the jury, opinion on the proposition remained comparatively stable. Most jurors indicated that they thought that food and drink sponsorship and/or advertising at children’s sporting events would have little or no effect on altering children’s diet and eating habits, with the proportion increasing during the jury process. Jurors were given evaluation sheets about the content of the jury and the process of the citizens’ jury to complete at the end of the session. The evaluation of the citizens’ jury process revealed positive perceptions. The majority of jurors agreed that their knowledge of the issues of food and drink sponsorship in children’s sport had increased as a result of participation in the citizens’ jury. The majority also viewed the decision-making process as fair and felt that their views were listened to. One important response in the evaluation was that all jurors indicated that, if given the opportunity, they would participate in another citizens’ jury. Conclusions The findings suggest that the citizens’ jury increased participant knowledge of the issue and facilitated reflective discussion of the proposition. Citizens’ juries are an effective means of gaining insight into public views of policy and the circumstances under which the public will consider food regulation; however a number of issues need to be considered to ensure the successful conduct of a citizens’ jury.

Method and ethics in advancing jury research

Female and Jury

The American Jury System: A Synthetic Overview

Inclusive peer review: Reflections on an adapted citizens' jury with people with learning disabilities

Revisiting Daubert: Judicial Gatekeeping and Expert Ethics in Court

Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries

Jury Instructions in Hong Kong: A Gricean Perspective

A Case-Based Study Of Jury Instructions In Hong Kong

Are the Jury Trial Declining and Dying?--An Explanation of the Modern Anglo-American Jury Trial Tendency

Social Media Jurors: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Online Public Engagement in reference to Legal Cases

Evaluating the use of citizens’ juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation

Between a ‘media circus’ and ‘seeing justice being done’: Metajournalistic discourse and the transparency of justice in the debate on filming trials in British newspapers

Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et al.

The impact of misinformation presented during jury deliberation on juror memory and decision-making

Managerial Judicial Conflict Resolution (JCR) of Plea Bargaining

The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

Psychological features of the formation of jury prejudice against the defendant

Hope and Choice: the Resolution of the Jury's Function and Realization

The Role of Emotion and Motivation in Jury Decision-Making

The ethical value of consulting community members in non-emergency trials conducted with waivers of informed consent for research