Abstract:In social economic decisions, people not only care about their own payoffs but also the payoffs of others, a tendency termed altruistic preference. Numerous studies have shown that the sheer sense of being observed is sufficient to augment subjects' altruistic choices. However, whether subjects' altruistic behavior can be modulated by other stake-holders in the decision context remains unclear. In this study, we provide experimental evidence about the effects of visibility from receivers and social norms on the altruistic preference of the deciders in two studies. First, we confirmed the visibility effect originating from receivers on deciders' altruistic preference in Study 1. In Study 2, we further showed that social norms modulated the effect of behavior visibility on deciders' altruistic preference, suggesting a potential avenue via which social norms influence the relationship between behavioral visibility and altruistic preference. Study 1 implemented a 2 ( visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 (reaction type: choice vs. rating) x 2 (inequity aversion: AIA vs. DIA) within-subject design. We recruited 38 participants and they were required to either choose from two reward allocation options (choice task) with another partner, or rate how satisfied concerning a particular allocation (rating task) in a dictator game (DG). Participants' behavior was either observed by their "partners" (visible condition) or remained private (invisible condition). We provided both model-free and model-based evidence for the effects of visibility on altruistic preference. Compared to the invisible condition, participants exhibited greater altruistic preference when their behavior were visible to the receivers (partners). This tendency was significant across both choice and rating tasks. In addition, participants cared more about allocation efficiency in the choice task than in the rating task. Finally, visibility alleviated the behavioral discrepancies between the rating and choice tasks, indicating that social preference and choice strategies tend to converge in the visible condition. Study 2 implemented a 2 (visibility: visible vs. invisible) x 2 ( social norm: altruistic vs. non-altruistic) within- subject design. 53 participants took part in the study with altruistic or non-altruistic social norms. Different social norms were manipulated by presenting the proportions of choosing the unfair options from previous participants: In the altruistic social norm condition, most previous participants chose the option that maximizes others' relative payoffs, while in the non- altruistic condition it was the opposite. Our results showed that in the altruistic social norm condition, visibility significantly increased participants' altruistic preference. However, such effect diminished in the non-altruistic social norm condition. Our study revealed that deciders' behavioral visibility to receivers increased altruistic preference and promoted altruistic behavior. Furthermore, the altruistic social norm played a modulatory role on the visibility effect, supporting the signaling hypothesis of altruistic preference.

Norm focusing and losses—Evidence of ultimatum game experiments

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis✩

Prosocial Gains and Losses: Modulations of Human Social Decision-Making by Loss-Gain Context

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making

Sharing losses and sharing gains: Increased demand for fairness under adversity

Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses

Mind the framing when studying social preferences in the domain of losses

Negative economic shocks and the compliance to social norms

The Norm Game - How a Norm Fails

Distinguishing fast change in social norms and slow change in personal norms in cooperative decision-making

Neural Correlates of Proposers’ Fairness Perception in Punishment and Non-Punishment Economic Games

Self-interested behaviour as a social norm

Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game

Social Norm Modulates the Enhancement Effect of Behavioral Visibility on Altruistic Preference

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Ultimatum game: regret or fairness?

Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study