Abstract:Several theoretical frameworks have attempted to illustrate the influence of social contexts on decision-making and well-being. Traditional economic models assume that absolute income is the crucial determinant of one's well-being, while the comparative models state that social comparisons influence and even determine well-being and decisions. Here we investigated the impact of social comparisons on decision-making using a modified three-player Ultimatum Game and ERP technique. We found two independent effects: First, social comparisons did not affect decision-making when a fair norm was enforced. Second, social comparisons affected fairness consideration for unfair offers only—responders were less likely to accept unfair offers in upward comparisons but more likely to accept unfair offers in downward comparisons. These results revealed that people were envy-free of fair offers while affected mainly by social comparisons when the equality norm was broken. Event-related brain potentials showed that in the early time window (260–320 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers elicited a larger negative-going medial frontal negativity (MFN) in upward than parallel and downward comparisons, and in the late stage (320–650 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers led to equally less positive-going P300 in upward and downward comparisons relative to parallel comparison. Although partly consistent with the relative standing assumption, both traditional economic models and comparative models require revision to account for the results.

Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis✩

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Sharing losses and sharing gains: Increased demand for fairness under adversity

Mind the framing when studying social preferences in the domain of losses

Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game

Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses

Prosocial Gains and Losses: Modulations of Human Social Decision-Making by Loss-Gain Context

The Effect of Social Information in the Dictator Game with a Taking Option

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving

If I Share With You, Will You Share With Me? A Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Anxiety and Self-Disclosure in Dictator Game

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Advice and behavior in a dictator game: An experimental study

The interplay between sharing behavior and beliefs about others in children during dictator games

Ultimatum game: regret or fairness?

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Influence of peer information and personality on social exclusion in a three‐person dictator game

Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game