Abstract:Abstract We study why suffering a negative economic shock, i.e., a significant loss, may trigger a change in other-regarding behavior. We conjecture that people trade off concern for money with a conditional preference to follow social norms and that suffering a shock makes extrinsic motivation more salient, leading to more norm violation. This hypothesis is grounded on the premise that preferences are norm-dependent. We study this question experimentally: after administering losses on the earnings from a real-effort task, we analyze choices in prosocial and antisocial settings. To derive our predictions, we elicit social norms for each context analyzed in the experiments. We find evidence that shock increases deviations from norms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How do negative economic shocks (NES) affect individuals' compliance with social norms?** Specifically, the authors study whether such shocks will lead individuals to be more likely to violate social norms, such as stealing, cheating, and retaliating, when they suffer significant economic losses.
### Background and Hypotheses of the Paper
1. **Definition of Negative Economic Shocks**
- Negative economic shocks refer to significant losses in an individual's income or accumulated assets, which may be caused by psychosocial stress (such as divorce, unemployment, injury) or traumatic events (such as violence, disasters).
2. **Existing Literature**
- The existing literature mainly focuses on the impact of negative economic shocks on poverty and how these shocks change individual behavior. For example, some studies show that people who have suffered negative economic shocks are more likely to support extreme candidates in elections.
3. **Definition of Social Norms**
- Social norms are defined as a set of behavioral rules that depend on people's expectations of others' behavior and their perception of appropriateness.
4. **Hypotheses**
- The authors assume that decision - makers weigh between monetary concerns and compliance with social norms. When suffering from negative economic shocks, individuals' concerns about money increase, which makes the marginal cost of complying with social norms rise, thus leading to more norm - violating behaviors.
### Experimental Design and Methods
1. **Experimental Design**
- The authors designed three experiments to verify their hypotheses. In the experiments, participants first completed a real - effort task (RET), and then were randomly assigned to the experimental group (suffering an 80% loss of income) or the control group (maintaining the original income). Subsequently, participants made choices in different tasks, including stealing, cheating, joy of destruction (JoD), and prisoner's dilemma (PD).
2. **Elicitation of Social Norms**
- To ensure the validity of the experimental results, the authors elicited the social norms in each task through questionnaires. Participants were required to report the "correct" behavior they thought and guess others' behavioral expectations.
### Main Findings
1. **Stealing Task**
- Participants who received negative economic shocks were more likely to steal than those in the control group. The stealing rate increased from 62% to 73.9%, and this difference was statistically significant (Fisher’s exact = 0.114, 1 - sided p = 0.057).
2. **Cheating Task**
- Participants who received negative economic shocks also showed a higher tendency to cheat in the cheating task. They were more likely to report high - yield numbers (4 and 5) when reporting the dice points, and this difference was approximately one - fourth of the standard deviation of the control group.
3. **Joy of Destruction Task**
- When participants expected the other party to retaliate, those who received negative economic shocks were less likely to choose retaliation. The retaliation rate decreased from 54.38% to 33.33%, and this difference was also economically meaningful and statistically significant.
4. **Prisoner's Dilemma**
- In the prisoner's dilemma task, the authors did not find a significant impact of negative economic shocks on cooperative behavior.
### Conclusion
This paper confirms through experimental research that negative economic shocks do increase individuals' behavior of violating social norms, especially in stealing and cheating tasks. This finding is of great significance for understanding the impact of economic shocks on social behavior and also provides a theoretical basis for policy - making.