Abstract:Abstract Background Based on social comparison theory, two experiments were conducted to explore the effects of depression and social comparison on adolescents, using the ultimatum game (UG). Methods Before the formal experiment began, a preliminary experiment tested the effectiveness of social comparison settings. This study used the UG paradigm to explore adolescents’ social decision-making in the context of gain and loss through two experiments. These experiments were designed as a 2 (group: depressive mood group, normal mood group) × 2 (social comparison: upward, downward) × 3 (fairness level: fair 5:5, unfair 3:7, extremely unfair 1:9) three-factor hybrid study. Results (1) The fairer the proposal was, the higher the sense of fairness participants felt, and the higher their acceptance rate. (2) The acceptance rate of the participants for downward social comparison was significantly higher than that for upward social comparison, but there was no difference in fairness perception between the two social comparisons. (3) Under the context of gain, the acceptance rate of the depressive mood group was higher than that of the normal mood group, but there was no difference in the acceptance rate between the depressive mood group and the normal mood group under the loss context. Depressive mood participants had more feelings of unfairness in the contexts of both gain and loss. (4) The effects of depressive mood, social comparison and the fairness level of distribution on social decision-making interact. Conclusions The interaction of social comparison, depressive mood and proposal type demonstrates that besides one’s emotion, cognitive biases and social factors can also have an effect on social decision-making. These findings indicate that behavioral decision boosting may provide an avenue for appropriate interventions in helping to guide adolescents to make social decisions.

A negative emotional and economic judgment bias in major depression

How depressive symptoms and fear of negative evaluation affect feedback evaluation in social decision-making

The effects of social comparison and depressive mood on adolescent social decision-making

Twice the negativity bias and half the positivity offset: Evaluative responses to emotional information in depression

Regret and the Negative Evaluation of Decision Outcomes in Major Depression

Depression is associated with blunted affective responses to naturalistic reward prediction errors

Negative Bias During Early Attentional Engagement in Major Depressive Disorder as Examined Using a Two-Stage Model: High Sensitivity to Sad but Bluntness to Happy Cues

Implicit and explicit behavioral tendencies in male and female depression

How negative mood hinders belief updating in depression: results from two experimental studies

Social decision-making in major depressive disorder: A three-level meta-analysis

Relationship between low mood and micro-expression processing: evidence of negative bias in interpreting fleeting facial expressions

“I Feel Therefore I Decide”: Effect of Negative Emotions on Temporal Discounting and Probability Discounting

If it Ain't Broke, Don't Fix it: Positive Versus Negative Emotion Regulation in Daily Life and Depressive Symptoms

The perception-behavior dissociation in the ultimatum game in unmedicated patients with major depressive disorders.

Subjective pain and reward in a social judgment paradigm

Lack of optimistic bias during social evaluation learning reflects reduced positive self-beliefs in depression and social anxiety, but via distinct mechanisms

The influence of cooperation and defection on social decision making in depression: A study of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Amygdala reactivity to masked negative faces is associated with automatic judgmental bias in major depression: a 3 T fMRI study

Electrophysiological correlates of why humans deviate from rational decision-making: A registered replication study

Are depressive symptoms linked to a reduced pupillary response to novel positive information?—An eye tracking proof-of-concept study

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining