Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women and a quantitative contrast‐free method is highly desirable for its diagnosis.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the performance of quantitative MRI in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions and to compare with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Retrospective.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Subjects</h3><p>Eighty patients (56 with malignant lesions and 24 with benign lesions).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) with a single‐shot echo planar sequence and synthetic MRI with magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) were performed at 3T.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>T<sub>1</sub> relaxation time (T<sub>1</sub>), T<sub>2</sub> relaxation time (T<sub>2</sub>), and proton density (PD) from synthetic MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI were analyzed by two radiologists (Reader A, Reader B). Univariable and multivariable models were developed to optimize differentiation between malignant and benign lesions and their performances compared to BI‐RADS. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>The diagnostic performance was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>T<sub>2</sub>, PD, and ADC values for malignant lesions were significantly lower than those in benign breast lesions for both radiologists (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). The combined T<sub>2</sub>, PD, and ADC model had the best performance for differentiating malignant and benign lesions with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 0.904, 94.6%, 87.5%, 94.6%, and 87.5%, respectively. The corresponding results for BI‐RADS were no AUC, 94.6%, 75.0%, 89.8%, and 85.7%, respectively. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>The approach that combined synthetic MRI and DWI outperformed BI‐RADS in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions and was achieved without contrast agents. This approach may serve as an alternative and effective strategy for the improvement of breast lesion differentiation.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>3.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy Stage</h3><p>3.</p></section>

Are we ready to stratify BI-RADS 4 lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging? A real-world noninferiority/equivalence analysis

Use of US BIRADS for the Differentiation of Male Breast Masses and Interobserver Agreement Assessment

Characteristics of Suspicious Breast Lesions Visible Only on MR Imaging: Is It Possible to Classify into Immediate Biopsy and Careful Observation Groups?

Value of breast MRI omics features and clinical characteristics in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions: an analysis of radiomics-based diagnosis

The value of MRI for downgrading of breast suspicious lesions detected on ultrasound

A risk prediction stratification for non-mass breast lesions, combining clinical characteristics and imaging features on ultrasound, mammography, and MRI

The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features

Subcategorization of suspicious non-mass-like enhancement lesions(BI-RADS-MRI Category4)

Evaluation of the Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Mr Imaging for Patients with Bi-Rads 3-4 Microcalcifications

Follow-up results of BI-RADS 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study

Application of MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model to Improve Contralateral BI-RADS 4 Lesion Assessment

Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category

Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value.

Investigation of Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measures in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions as Compared to BI‐RADS

Our Radiological Experience on B3 Lesions: Correlation Between Mammographic and MRI Findings With Histologic Definitive Result

The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China

Identification of the Benignity and Malignancy of BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions Based on a Combined Quantitative Model of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion

Ultrasound classification of non-mass breast lesions following BI-RADS presents high positive predictive value

Value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Carcinomas

BI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES

Abstract PD15-08: PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes