Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Rationale and Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the fifth edition of the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in clinical breast radiology by using prospective multicenter real-time analyses of ultrasound (US) images.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and Methods</h3><p>We prospectively studied 2049 female patients (age range, 19-86 years; mean age 46.88 years) with BI-RADS category 4 breast masses in 32 tertiary hospitals. All the patients underwent B-mode, color Doppler US, and US elastography examination. US features of the mass and associated features were described and categorized according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS US lexicon. The pathological results were used as the reference standard. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of subcategories 4a-4c were calculated.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>A total of 2094 masses were obtained, including 1124 benign masses (54.9%) and 925 malignant masses (45.1%). For BI-RADS US features of mass shape, orientation, margin, posterior features, calcifications, architectural distortion, edema, skin changes, vascularity, and elasticity assessment were significantly different for benign and malignant masses (<em>p</em>< 0.05). Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape (PPV, 57.2%), spiculated margin (PPV, 83.7%), nonparallel orientation (PPV, 63.9%), and combined pattern of posterior features (PPV, 60.6%). For the changed or newly added US features, the PPVs for intraductal calcifications were 80%, 56.4% for internal vascularity, and 80% for a hard pattern on elastography. The associated features such as architectural distortion (PPV, 89.3%), edema (PPV, 69.2%), and skin changes (PPV, 76.2%) displayed high predictive value for malignancy. The rate of malignant was 7.4% (72/975) in category 4a, 61.4% (283/461) in category 4b, and 93.0% (570/613) in category 4c. The PPV for category 4b was higher than the likelihood ranges specified in BI-RADS and the PPVs for categories 4a and 4c were within the acceptable performance ranges specified in the fifth edition of BI-RADS in our study.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Not only the US features of the breast mass, but also associated features, including vascularity and elasticity assessment, have become an indispensable part of the fifth edition of BI-RADS US lexicon to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. The subdivision of category 4 lesions into categories 4a, 4b, and 4c for US findings is helpful for further assessment of the likelihood of malignancy of breast lesions.</p>

Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value.

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of the 2013 Edition of BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Categories 3 to 5 Lesions

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Use of US BIRADS for the Differentiation of Male Breast Masses and Interobserver Agreement Assessment

Application of Breast Ultrasound Imaging Report and Data System classification in diagnosis of special types of breast cancer

The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China

A Retrospective Study of Ultrasonographic Characteristics and Clinical Factors Affecting the BI-RADS Classification (probably Benign Breast Lesions)

The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features

Can Short-term Follow-up with Ultrasound Be Offered As an Acceptable Alternative to Immediate Biopsy or Surgery for Patients with First Ultrasound Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A Lesions?

Subclassification of BI-RADS 4 Magnetic Resonance Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sonographic features of dense breast imaging reporting and data system 4 ( BI-RADS-US 4 ) for non-palpable breast lesions

Value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Carcinomas

Reliability Investigation and Influential Factors Analysis of BI-RADS-ultrasound Categorization on the Benign Breast Nodules

Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RA DS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging

Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?

Value of breast MRI omics features and clinical characteristics in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions: an analysis of radiomics-based diagnosis

Characteristics of Suspicious Breast Lesions Visible Only on MR Imaging: Is It Possible to Classify into Immediate Biopsy and Careful Observation Groups?

Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China.

BI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES

Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital