Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Rationale and Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of the fifth edition of the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in clinical breast radiology by using prospective multicenter real-time analyses of ultrasound (US) images.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and Methods</h3><p>We prospectively studied 2049 female patients (age range, 19-86 years; mean age 46.88 years) with BI-RADS category 4 breast masses in 32 tertiary hospitals. All the patients underwent B-mode, color Doppler US, and US elastography examination. US features of the mass and associated features were described and categorized according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS US lexicon. The pathological results were used as the reference standard. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of subcategories 4a-4c were calculated.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>A total of 2094 masses were obtained, including 1124 benign masses (54.9%) and 925 malignant masses (45.1%). For BI-RADS US features of mass shape, orientation, margin, posterior features, calcifications, architectural distortion, edema, skin changes, vascularity, and elasticity assessment were significantly different for benign and malignant masses (<em>p</em>< 0.05). Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape (PPV, 57.2%), spiculated margin (PPV, 83.7%), nonparallel orientation (PPV, 63.9%), and combined pattern of posterior features (PPV, 60.6%). For the changed or newly added US features, the PPVs for intraductal calcifications were 80%, 56.4% for internal vascularity, and 80% for a hard pattern on elastography. The associated features such as architectural distortion (PPV, 89.3%), edema (PPV, 69.2%), and skin changes (PPV, 76.2%) displayed high predictive value for malignancy. The rate of malignant was 7.4% (72/975) in category 4a, 61.4% (283/461) in category 4b, and 93.0% (570/613) in category 4c. The PPV for category 4b was higher than the likelihood ranges specified in BI-RADS and the PPVs for categories 4a and 4c were within the acceptable performance ranges specified in the fifth edition of BI-RADS in our study.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Not only the US features of the breast mass, but also associated features, including vascularity and elasticity assessment, have become an indispensable part of the fifth edition of BI-RADS US lexicon to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions. The subdivision of category 4 lesions into categories 4a, 4b, and 4c for US findings is helpful for further assessment of the likelihood of malignancy of breast lesions.</p>

Value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Carcinomas

Application of Breast Ultrasound Imaging Report and Data System classification in diagnosis of special types of breast cancer

BI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES

Use of US BIRADS for the Differentiation of Male Breast Masses and Interobserver Agreement Assessment

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The Application of BI-RADS in the Diagnosis of Breast Cystic-Solid Lesions

Sonographic features of dense breast imaging reporting and data system 4 ( BI-RADS-US 4 ) for non-palpable breast lesions

Value of Differential Diagnosis for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Ultrasonic BI－RADS Classification and Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification

Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Role of BI-RADS in Guiding Surgical Inter Vention of Non-Palpable, Ultrasound-Negative and Mammography-Suspicious Breast Lesions

Application of MRI Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in Breast Lesions

A Retrospective Study of Ultrasonographic Characteristics and Clinical Factors Affecting the BI-RADS Classification (probably Benign Breast Lesions)

Ultrasound classification of non-mass breast lesions following BI-RADS presents high positive predictive value

Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A

Value of breast MRI omics features and clinical characteristics in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions: an analysis of radiomics-based diagnosis

Diagnostic value of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography with BI-RADS lexicon for breast diseases

The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China

Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence automatic detection systems for breast BI-RADS 4 nodules

Combination of BI-RADS for ultrasound and shear wave elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions