Abstract:Roxanne Bavarian, 1, 2 Tamunodiyepriye Gift Ngo, 3 Michael E Schatman, 4, 5 Ronald J Kulich 3, 6 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 3 Orofacial Pain Center, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 5 Department of Population Health – Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 6 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine/Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence: Michael E Schatman, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA, Tel +1 425-647-4880, Email Educational efforts in pain medicine have been a mainstay of international academic organizations for more than 50 years. For example, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) was one of the first of these organizations, and continues today with a mission that includes "exchange of ideas and education to stimulate and support the study of pain and to translate that knowledge into improved pain relief worldwide". 1 However, as commercial industry sponsors found an audience for the marketing of their products and services, a number of pain educational groups went awry. By the late 1990s, external forces seemingly brought increased accountability to the field, and efforts were made to improve educational programs with transparency regarding conflicts of interest and to deliver more evidence-based content and decrease bias. Nonetheless, the problem remains especially challenging within the field of chronic pain, an area of practice in which a number of treatments continue to be supported despite inconsistent evidence for safety and efficacy. Multiple challenges continue to face pain educators today, such as upholding standards of academic integrity, minimizing conflicts of interest and bias, and maintaining interdisciplinary communication, while remaining accessible for healthcare providers, researchers, patients, and other stakeholders. The Lyceum for Pain Education and its weekly Interdisciplinary Pain and Headache Rounds offer one such template to meet these challenges and mitigate common problems with pain education. Upon switching to a virtual format after 20 years due to the COVID-19 crisis, these seminars provide evidence-based continuing education (CE) to clinicians, researchers, and public policy makers who have an interest in a wide variety of pain topics. The programs are provided at no cost to attendees, with sponsorship derived from philanthropic efforts as opposed to industry funding. In this article, we discuss the challenges that face CE and our experience in navigating them. One significant problem that faced many CE offerings in the late 1990s was not only due to the impact of industry bias, but due to the absence of independent scientific reviewers. 2 For example, a 2007 annual report from the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) determined that more than 30,000 CME activities each year were sponsored by for-profit medical education and communication centers that received approximately 90% of their income from commercial support. 2,3 In our experience, many CE committees play a minimal role in vetting the materials that they sponsor. Rather, speakers are recruited by program planners who are thought to be experts in the field. This model of recruitment is in contrast to the model typically utilized in scientific writing and publishing, in which a critical independent review of the scientific content is necessary. The field of pain medicine can easily find itself susceptible to "junk science", alongside any other field in which patient suffering is great, treatment pathways are weak, and financial incentives persist. Some may be surprised that these issues are not new, and in fact, clinicians and academicians in the 19th century fought the same battles. Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., an early champion of evidence-based medicine, lectured and wrote extensively on the issue: "When a half-starving medical man felt that he must give his patient draught and boluses for which he could charge him, he was in a pitiable position and too likely to persuade himself that his drugs were useful to his patient because they were profitable to him". 4 At the Lyceum for Pain Education, our Board of Directors consists of specialists in neurology, pain psychology, nursing, orofacial -Abstract Truncated-

Using Simulation to Illustrate Pain

Challenging the Nuances of Pain Assessment With Co-designed Audio-Visual Simulations in Nursing Education: A Descriptive Study

Deconstructing One Medical School’s Pain Curriculum: II. Partnering with Medical Students on an Evidence-Guided Redesign

Teaching Strategies for Nonpharmacological Pain Management to Nursing Students

Improving Pain Management for Marginalized Communities: Educating the Next Generation of Health Care Professionals

Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Pain

Pain Psychology: A Global Needs Assessment and National Call to Action

Shifts in Students' Attitudes Towards Pain Patients, Pain, and Opioid Management Following a Dedicated Medical School Pain Curriculum

Chronic neuropathic pain: issues in patient education

Brief Psychological and Hypnotic Interventions in Chronic Pain Management

136 Point-of-View Simulation of Illness Experiences for Health Professions: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Cognitive expertise, emotional development, and reflective capacity: clinical skills for improved pain care

Construction and application of simulation course of opioid-induced clinical crisis management for pain nurse in ward

Best-Evidence for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Pain Part 1: Pediatric Pain

The Lyceum for Pain Education: Providing Accessible Education on Chronic Pain and Headaches to a Global Audience

Virtual Reality, Music and Pain: developing the premise for an interdisciplinary approach to pain management.

Simulation's Use Across the Clinical Landscape

Nursing students' empathic communication: role in recognizing and treating chronic pain patients

What resources do people with persistent pain use to help them better understand their pain? A cross-sectional survey

Summer undergraduate research: A new pipeline for pain clinical practice and research

Using simulation to introduce students and healthcare professionals to losses experienced by older adults: a pre-post analysis